These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3035388)
41. [Biological markers: what changes with prophylaxis?]. Mannessier L J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Sep; 36 Suppl 1():S9-11. PubMed ID: 18228706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn. Guidelines are not followed in many cases. McFadyen IR; Martlew VJ; Howard HL; Clarke CA BMJ; 1998 Apr; 316(7138):1165. PubMed ID: 9569417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Prophylactic anti-D for RhD- patient in France: an hasty recommendation?]. Benachi A; Nisand I J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Oct; 36(6):523-5. PubMed ID: 17651919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Rhesus isoimmunization. Plevyak MP; Carr SR Med Health R I; 2001 May; 84(5):148-51. PubMed ID: 11392951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A review of the clinical effectiveness of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for rhesus-negative women who are pregnant. Jones ML; Wray J; Wight J; Chilcott J; Forman K; Tappenden P; Beverley C BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):892-902. PubMed ID: 15327601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. More on Rhogam. Keutzer B Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2000; (56):68-9; author reply 69. PubMed ID: 11984911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Rhogam: do midwives hold the evidence? Wickham S Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 1998; (46):34-5. PubMed ID: 10338629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Failure to prevent rhesus immunisation with rhesus immune globulin after incompatible blood transfusion. Branch DW; Guyman G; Scott JR Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8425):393-4. PubMed ID: 2857440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Prevention of isoimmunization in pregnancy developed by Freda and Gorman. Dunn LJ Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1999 Dec; 54(12 Suppl):S1-6. PubMed ID: 10603603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Consensus Conference on anti-D prophylaxis, 7-8 April 1997. Br J Haematol; 1997 Jun; 97(4):927-8. PubMed ID: 9217199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Anti-D. Part 2: Risks and benefits. Wickham S Pract Midwife; 1999 Jun; 2(6):38-9. PubMed ID: 10481677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Isoimmunization in pregnancy. Shaver SM Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2004 Jun; 16(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 15145363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. ACOG releases report on prevention of D isoimmunization. Am Fam Physician; 1991 Jan; 43(1):307-8, 310. PubMed ID: 1846056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Anti-D administration after childbirth for preventing Rhesus isoimmunisation. Anderson T Pract Midwife; 1999 May; 2(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 12024602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Prevention of post-transfusion RhD immunization using red cell exchange and intravenous anti-D immunoglobulin. Laspina S; O'riordan JM; Lawlor E; Murphy WG Vox Sang; 2005 Jul; 89(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 15938740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn. New recommendations must be explained to GPs and midwives. Everett C; Wray J BMJ; 1998 Apr; 316(7138):1165. PubMed ID: 9569419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]