These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of in vivo tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in a canine thigh muscle preparation. Nakagawa H; Yamanashi WS; Pitha JV; Arruda M; Wang X; Ohtomo K; Beckman KJ; McClelland JH; Lazzara R; Jackman WM Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(8):2264-73. PubMed ID: 7697856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of ablation catheter technology: Comparison between thigh preparation model and an in vivo beating heart. Leshem E; Tschabrunn CM; Contreras-Valdes FM; Zilberman I; Anter E Heart Rhythm; 2017 Aug; 14(8):1234-1240. PubMed ID: 28455271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transmembraneous irrigation of multipolar radiofrequency ablation catheters: induction of linear lesions encircling the pulmonary vein ostium without the risk of coagulum formation? Weiss C; Stewart M; Franzen O; Rostock T; Becker J; Skarda JR; Meinertz T; Willems S J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2004 Jun; 10(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 15133356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In Vitro Validation of the Lesion Size Index to Predict Lesion Width and Depth After Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation in a Porcine Model. Calzolari V; De Mattia L; Indiani S; Crosato M; Furlanetto A; Licciardello C; Squasi PAM; Olivari Z JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Oct; 3(10):1126-1135. PubMed ID: 29759495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lesion Size and Safety Comparison Between the Novel Flex Tip on the FlexAbility Ablation Catheter and the Solid Tips on the ThermoCool and ThermoCool SF Ablation Catheters. Winterfield JR; Jensen J; Gilbert T; Marchlinski F; Natale A; Packer D; Reddy V; Mahapatra S; Wilber DJ J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 26359632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modulating the Baseline Impedance: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate. Shapira-Daniels A; Barkagan M; Rottmann M; Sroubek J; Tugal D; Carlozzi MA; McConville JW; Buxton AE; Anter E Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 Jun; 12(6):e007336. PubMed ID: 31113232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and efficacy of delivering high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation lesions utilizing a novel temperature sensing technology. Rozen G; Ptaszek LM; Zilberman I; Douglas V; Heist EK; Beeckler C; Altmann A; Ruskin JN; Govari A; Mansour M Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f444-f450. PubMed ID: 29579196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Irrigant Characteristics on Lesion Formation After Radiofrequency Energy Delivery Using Ablation Catheters with Actively Cooled Tips. Nguyen DT; Olson M; Zheng L; Barham W; Moss JD; Sauer WH J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jul; 26(7):792-8. PubMed ID: 25864402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Parameters That May Induce Intracardiac Steam Pops: Direct Visualization of Elicitation in Reanimated Swine Hearts. Iles TL; Quallich SG; Iaizzo PA J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2019 Jun; 12(3):250-256. PubMed ID: 30430355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of different ablation settings on lesion dimensions in an ex vivo swine heart model: Baseline impedance, irrigant, and electrode configuration. Jiang X; Li S; Xiong Q; Zhang C; Peng L; Chen W; Cai Y; Yin Y; Chen S; Ling Z J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Jan; 34(1):117-125. PubMed ID: 36403284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expandable Lattice Electrode Ablation Catheter: A Novel Radiofrequency Platform Allowing High Current at Low Density for Rapid, Titratable, and Durable Lesions. Barkagan M; Leshem E; Rottmann M; Sroubek J; Shapira-Daniels A; Anter E Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 Apr; 12(4):e007090. PubMed ID: 30943762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Ikeda A; Nakagawa H; Lambert H; Shah DC; Fonck E; Yulzari A; Sharma T; Pitha JV; Lazzara R; Jackman WM Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Dec; 7(6):1174-80. PubMed ID: 25381331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lesion Index Titration Using Contact-Force Technology Enables Safe and Effective Radiofrequency Lesion Creation at the Root of the Aorta and Pulmonary Artery. Alfonso-Almazán JM; Quintanilla JG; García-Torrent MJ; Laguna-Castro S; Rodríguez-Bobada C; González P; González-Ferrer JJ; Salinas P; Cañadas-Godoy V; Moreno J; Borrego-Bernabé L; Pérez-Castellano N; Jalife J; Perez-Villacastín J; Filgueiras-Rama D Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 Mar; 12(3):e007080. PubMed ID: 30879334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Yokoyama K; Nakagawa H; Shah DC; Lambert H; Leo G; Aeby N; Ikeda A; Pitha JV; Sharma T; Lazzara R; Jackman WM Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2008 Dec; 1(5):354-62. PubMed ID: 19808430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Target indices for clinical ablation in atrial fibrillation: insights from contact force, electrogram, and biophysical parameter analysis. Ullah W; Hunter RJ; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 7(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 24443504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visualizing intramyocardial steam formation with a radiofrequency ablation catheter incorporating near-field ultrasound. Wright M; Harks E; Deladi S; Fokkenrood S; Zuo F; Van Dusschoten A; Kolen AF; Belt H; Sacher F; Hocini M; Haïssaguerre M; Jaïs P J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Dec; 24(12):1403-9. PubMed ID: 23889831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Contact Force on Pulsed Field Ablation Outcomes Using Focal Point Catheter. Younis A; Santangeli P; Garrott K; Buck E; Tabaja C; Wass SY; Lehn L; Kleve R; Hussein AA; Nakhla S; Nakagawa H; Taigen T; Kanj M; Sroubek J; Saliba WI; Wazni OM Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2024 Jun; 17(6):e012723. PubMed ID: 38690671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]