These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30354523)

  • 1. Pacemaker Recall Highlights Security Concerns for Implantable Devices.
    Kuehn BM
    Circulation; 2018 Oct; 138(15):1597-1598. PubMed ID: 30354523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CIED Cybersecurity Risks in an Increasingly Connected World.
    Paulsen JE; Hazelett MB; Schwartz SB
    Circulation; 2018 Sep; 138(12):1181-1183. PubMed ID: 30354433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pacemaker Cybersecurity: Local Experience With a Firmware Upgrade.
    Baranchuk A; Alexander B; Campbell D; Haseeb S; Redfearn D; Simpson C; Glover B
    Circulation; 2018 Sep; 138(12):1272-1273. PubMed ID: 29748189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors Influencing the Decision to Proceed to Firmware Upgrades to Implanted Pacemakers for Cybersecurity Risk Mitigation.
    Saxon LA; Varma N; Epstein LM; Ganz LI; Epstein AE
    Circulation; 2018 Sep; 138(12):1274-1276. PubMed ID: 29748188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rates of Adoption and Outcomes After Firmware Updates for Food and Drug Administration Cybersecurity Safety Advisories.
    Saxon LA; Varma N; Epstein LM; Ganz LI; Epstein AE
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2020 Aug; 13(8):e008364. PubMed ID: 32631098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Software-Related Recalls of Health Information Technology and Other Medical Devices: Implications for FDA Regulation of Digital Health.
    Ronquillo JG; Zuckerman DM
    Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):535-553. PubMed ID: 28895231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FDA regulation of cardiovascular devices and opportunities for improvement.
    Dhruva SS; Redberg RF
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2013 Mar; 36(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 23263896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overview of high-risk medical device recalls in obstetrics and gynecology from 2002 through 2016: implications for device safety.
    Janetos TM; Ghobadi CW; Xu S; Walter JR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):42-46.e1. PubMed ID: 28500861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recalls and safety alerts involving pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generators.
    Maisel WH; Sweeney MO; Stevenson WG; Ellison KE; Epstein LM
    JAMA; 2001 Aug; 286(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 11497532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular medical device recalls.
    Somberg JC; McEwen P; Molnar J
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(11):1899-903. PubMed ID: 24837271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical Device Recalls in Radiation Oncology: Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration Data, 2002-2015.
    Connor MJ; Tringale K; Moiseenko V; Marshall DC; Moore K; Cervino L; Atwood T; Brown D; Mundt AJ; Pawlicki T; Recht A; Hattangadi-Gluth JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jun; 98(2):438-446. PubMed ID: 28463163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MY APPROACH to cybersecurity for cardiac implantable electronic devices.
    Baranchuk A; Alexander B; Haseeb S
    Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2019 Feb; 29(2):129-130. PubMed ID: 30396783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FDA approves first pacemaker system safe for magnetic resonance imaging. Traditional cardiac devices have been at risk of malfunctioning or overheating with MRIs.
    Heart Advis; 2011 Apr; 14(4):1, 11. PubMed ID: 22973585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Obstetric and Gynecologic Food and Drug Administration Device Approvals and Recalls.
    Galhotra S; Maurice J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1281-1288. PubMed ID: 29653261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do Orthopaedic Devices Change After Their Initial FDA Premarket Approval?
    Samuel AM; Rathi VK; Grauer JN; Ross JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):1053-68. PubMed ID: 26584802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cardiac device creativity and innovation under constraints: Exploring trends from the food and drug administration's device clearances and recalls.
    Cremers T; Kashem A; Zhao H; Toyoda Y; Mokashi S
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Nov; 49(11):102781. PubMed ID: 39127432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Challenges and opportunities in software-driven medical devices.
    Gordon WJ; Stern AD
    Nat Biomed Eng; 2019 Jul; 3(7):493-497. PubMed ID: 31278389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the security and privacy of implantable medical devices.
    Maisel WH; Kohno T
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Apr; 362(13):1164-6. PubMed ID: 20357279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cybersecurity Concerns and Medical Devices: Lessons From a Pacemaker Advisory.
    Kramer DB; Fu K
    JAMA; 2017 Dec; 318(21):2077-2078. PubMed ID: 29049709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research: Evaluation of Orthopedic Hip Device Recalls by the FDA from 2007 to 2017.
    Peters W; Pellerin C; Janney C
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2020 Nov; 54(6):418-426. PubMed ID: 33339030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.