847 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30354590)
1. Unselected Use of Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization.
Yamaji K; Zanchin T; Zanchin C; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Hunziker L; Praz F; Blöchlinger S; Moro C; Moschovitis A; Seiler C; Valgimigli M; Billinger M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e006741. PubMed ID: 30354590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
Zbinden R; Piccolo R; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Muller O; Vuilliomenet A; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Franzone A; Eberli F; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Mar; 5(3):e003255. PubMed ID: 26979080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Everolimus-Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Versus Everolimus-Eluting Durable Polymer Stent for Coronary Revascularization in Routine Clinical Practice.
Zanchin C; Ueki Y; Zanchin T; Häner J; Otsuka T; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Siontis GCM; Praz F; Moschovitis A; Hunziker L; Valgimigli M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(17):1665-1675. PubMed ID: 31422088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.
Roguin A; Kandzari DE; Marcusohn E; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JM; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(10):e007331. PubMed ID: 30354631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.
Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 13(11):1343-1353. PubMed ID: 32499026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).
Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(12):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 28579236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-Term Effect of Ultrathin-Strut Versus Thin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of the BIOSCIENCE Randomized Trial.
Iglesias JF; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Noble S; Muller O; Moarof I; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Häner J; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Aug; 12(8):e008024. PubMed ID: 31525083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
Kufner S; Joner M; Thannheimer A; Hoppmann P; Ibrahim T; Mayer K; Cassese S; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A; Byrne RA;
Circulation; 2019 Jan; 139(3):325-333. PubMed ID: 30586724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions.
Dan K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kolm P; Windecker S; Saito S; Kandzari DE; Waksman R
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 13(9):e009189. PubMed ID: 32895004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical outcomes according to diabetic status in patients treated with biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: prespecified subgroup analysis of the BIOSCIENCE trial.
Franzone A; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Vuilliomenet A; Muller O; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Räber L; Stortecky S; Wenaweser P; Jüni P; Windecker S
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 26043895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
Iglesias JF; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Lanz J; Rigamonti F; Muller O; Moarof I; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Valgimigli M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Nov; 8(22):e013607. PubMed ID: 31696762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioresorbable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus-eluting stent vs durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in daily clinical practice: Propensity matched one-year results from interventional cardiology network registry.
Gasior P; Gierlotka M; Szczurek-Katanski K; Osuch M; Gnot R; Hawranek M; Gasior M; Polonski L
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jun; 93(7):E362-E368. PubMed ID: 30298545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: BIOFLOW V Final 5-Year Outcomes.
Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Sep; 15(18):1852-1860. PubMed ID: 36137689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized Multicenter Trial Investigating Angiographic Outcomes of Hybrid Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Compared With Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Chronic Total Occlusions: The PRISON IV Trial.
Teeuwen K; van der Schaaf RJ; Adriaenssens T; Koolen JJ; Smits PC; Henriques JP; Vermeersch PH; Tjon Joe Gin RM; Schölzel BE; Kelder JC; Tijssen JG; Agostoni P; Suttorp MJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jan; 10(2):133-143. PubMed ID: 28104206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Final 3-Year Outcomes of MiStent Biodegradable Polymer Crystalline Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Xience Permanent Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: Insights From the DESSOLVE III All-Comers Randomized Trial.
Takahashi K; Serruys PW; Kogame N; Buszman P; Lurz P; Jessurun GAJ; Koch KT; Troquay RPT; Hamer BJB; Oude Ophuis T; Milewski KP; Hofma SH; Wykrzykowska JJ; Onuma Y; de Winter RJ; Wijns W
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 13(6):e008737. PubMed ID: 32466676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.
Serruys PW; Farooq V; Kalesan B; de Vries T; Buszman P; Linke A; Ischinger T; Klauss V; Eberli F; Wijns W; Morice MC; Di Mario C; Corti R; Antoni D; Sohn HY; Eerdmans P; Rademaker-Havinga T; van Es GA; Meier B; Jüni P; Windecker S
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):777-89. PubMed ID: 23968698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 72(25):3287-3297. PubMed ID: 30257191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thin, Very Thin, or Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable or Durable Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents: 3-Year Outcomes of BIO-RESORT.
Buiten RA; Ploumen EH; Zocca P; Doggen CJM; Danse PW; Schotborgh CE; Scholte M; van Houwelingen KG; Stoel MG; Hartmann M; Tjon Joe Gin RM; Somi S; Linssen GCM; Kok MM; von Birgelen C
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(17):1650-1660. PubMed ID: 31422087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Everolimus-Eluting Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymers in Unselected Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial With 1-Year Follow-Up (SORT OUT VIII Trial).
Maeng M; Christiansen EH; Raungaard B; Kahlert J; Terkelsen CJ; Kristensen SD; Carstensen S; Aarøe J; Jensen SE; Villadsen AB; Lassen JF; Thim T; Eftekhari A; Veien KT; Hansen KN; Junker A; Bøtker HE; Jensen LO;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(7):624-633. PubMed ID: 30947936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized Comparison of a Biodegradable Polymer Ultrathin Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SORT OUT VII Trial.
Jensen LO; Thayssen P; Maeng M; Ravkilde J; Krusell LR; Raungaard B; Junker A; Terkelsen CJ; Veien KT; Villadsen AB; Kaltoft A; Tilsted HH; Hansen KN; Aaroe J; Kristensen SD; Hansen HS; Jensen SE; Madsen M; Bøtker HE; Berencsi K; Lassen JF; Christiansen EH
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 27412869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
