523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30354907)
21. Comparison of the Prognostic Value of F-18 Pet Metabolic Parameters of Primary Tumors and Regional Lymph Nodes in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Who Are Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
Chong GO; Jeong SY; Park SH; Lee YH; Lee SW; Hong DG; Kim JC; Lee YS; Cho YL
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137743. PubMed ID: 26368542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pretreatment Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Is Significantly Correlated With Event-Free Survival in Patients With International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage Ib to IIIb Cervical Cancer.
Himoto Y; Fujimoto K; Kido A; Baba T; Tanaka S; Morisawa N; Koyasu S; Konishi I; Togashi K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1079-85. PubMed ID: 25853385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measurement of SUVmax plus ADCmin of the primary tumour is a predictor of prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.
Nakamura K; Joja I; Kodama J; Hongo A; Hiramatsu Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Feb; 39(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 22072286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pre-treatment prediction of early response to chemoradiotherapy by quantitative analysis of baseline staging FDG-PET/CT and MRI in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Min LA; Ackermans LL; Nowee ME; Griethuysen JJV; Roberti S; Maas M; Vogel WV; Beets-Tan RG; Lambregts DM
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jul; 62(7):940-948. PubMed ID: 32722967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictive value of nodal maximum standardized uptake value of pretreatment [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in patients with esophageal cancer.
Yap WK; Chang YC; Tseng CK; Hsieh CH; Chao YK; Su PJ; Hou MM; Yang CK; Pai PC; Lin CR; Hsieh CE; Wu YY; Hung TM
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Aug; 30(8):1-10. PubMed ID: 28575243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognostic value of metabolic response measured by 18F-FDG-PET in oesophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Onal C; Torun N; Guler OC; Yildirim BA
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1282-1289. PubMed ID: 27612030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Correlation between functional imaging markers derived from diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal cancer.
Goense L; Heethuis SE; van Rossum PSN; Voncken FEM; Lagendijk JJW; Lam MGEH; Terhaard CH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP; Mook S; van Lier ALHMW; Lin SH; Meijer GJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 29023336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of FDG PET metabolic tumour volume versus ADC histogram: prognostic value of tumour treatment response and survival in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer.
Ueno Y; Lisbona R; Tamada T; Alaref A; Sugimura K; Reinhold C
Br J Radiol; 2017 Jul; 90(1075):20170035. PubMed ID: 28508679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI and
Ng SH; Liao CT; Lin CY; Chan SC; Lin YC; Yen TC; Chang JT; Ko SF; Fan KH; Wang HM; Yang LY; Wang JJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):4162-4172. PubMed ID: 26911889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The predictive value of measurement of SUVmax and SCC-antigen in patients with pretreatment of primary squamous cell carcinoma of cervix.
Nakamura K; Okumura Y; Kodama J; Hongo A; Kanazawa S; Hiramatsu Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Oct; 119(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 20580064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Predictor of Outcome in Cervical Cancer After Chemoradiation.
Ho JC; Allen PK; Bhosale PR; Rauch GM; Fuller CD; Mohamed AS; Frumovitz M; Jhingran A; Klopp AH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Mar; 97(3):546-553. PubMed ID: 28011045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Treatment outcomes of patients with cervical cancer with complete metabolic responses after definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Onal C; Reyhan M; Guler OC; Yapar AF
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Jul; 41(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 24562649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prediction of tumour grade and survival outcome using pre-treatment PET- and MRI-derived imaging features in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Dunet V; Halkic N; Sempoux C; Demartines N; Montemurro M; Prior JO; Schmidt S
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):992-1001. PubMed ID: 32851447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. FDG PET using SUV
Huang YC; Lu HI; Huang SC; Hsu CC; Chiu NT; Wang YM; Chiu YC; Li SH
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Jan; 17(1):1. PubMed ID: 28056868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The prognostic value of FIGO staging defined by combining MRI and [
Raffa S; Lanfranchi F; Satragno C; Giannelli F; Marcenaro M; Coco A; Cena SE; Sofia L; Marini C; Mammoliti S; Levaggi A; Tagliafico AS; Sambuceti G; Barra S; Morbelli S; Belgioia L; Bauckneht M
Curr Probl Cancer; 2023 Dec; 47(6):101007. PubMed ID: 37684197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer without aortic lymph node involvement: can we consider metabolic parameters of pretherapeutic FDG-PET/CT for treatment tailoring?
Voglimacci M; Gabiache E; Lusque A; Ferron G; Ducassou A; Querleu D; Motton S; Chantalat E; Courbon F; Martinez A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1551-1559. PubMed ID: 30729273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake value measured by pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Cacicedo J; Fernandez I; Del Hoyo O; Navarro A; Gomez-Iturriaga A; Pijoan JI; Martinez-Indart L; Escudero J; Gomez-Suarez J; de Zarate RO; Perez JF; Bilbao P; Rades D
Clin Transl Oncol; 2017 Nov; 19(11):1337-1349. PubMed ID: 28540535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
