These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30356743)

  • 1. Too Worried to Judge: On the Role of Perceived Severity in Medical Decision-Making.
    Colomé À; Rodríguez-Ferreiro J; Tubau E
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1906. PubMed ID: 30356743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cancer Patients Numeracy and Preferences for Information Presentation-a Survey Among German Cancer Patients.
    Zomorodbakhsch B; Keinki C; Seilacher E; Huebner J;
    J Cancer Educ; 2020 Feb; 35(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 30338481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Worry about lung cancer is related to numeracy and risk perception of diseases associated with smoking.
    Diaz D; Fix B; Caruso R; Bansal-Travers M; O'Connor RJ
    Am J Health Educ; 2020; 51(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 33042323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
    Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining Insensitivity to Probability in Evidence-Based Communication of Relative Risks: The Role of Affect and Communication Format.
    Heard CL; Rakow T
    Risk Anal; 2022 Oct; 42(10):2145-2159. PubMed ID: 34839529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numeracy and the Motivational Mind: The Power of Numeric Self-efficacy.
    Peters E; Shoots-Reinhard B
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Aug; 42(6):729-740. PubMed ID: 35583117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Lure of Beauty: People Select Representations of Statistical Information Largely Based on Attractiveness, Not Comprehensibility.
    Gaissmaier W; Tiede KE; Garcia-Retamero R
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):774-788. PubMed ID: 37872798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Communicating Relative Risk Changes with Baseline Risk: Presentation Format and Numeracy Matter.
    Bodemer N; Meder B; Gigerenzer G
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):615-26. PubMed ID: 24803429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.
    Reyna VF; Nelson WL; Han PK; Dieckmann NF
    Psychol Bull; 2009 Nov; 135(6):943-73. PubMed ID: 19883143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Communicating risk: How relevant and irrelevant probabilistic information influences risk perception in medical decision-making.
    Hayakawa S; Marian V
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 23(3):678-690. PubMed ID: 36539559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between low perceived numeracy and cancer knowledge, beliefs, and affect.
    Ross K; Stoler J; Carcioppolo N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198992. PubMed ID: 29889890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "1-in-X" bias: "1-in-X" format causes overestimation of health-related risks.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Bonnefon JF
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Dec; 24(4):431-439. PubMed ID: 30247046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How Do People Process Different Representations of Statistical Information? Insights into Cognitive Effort, Representational Inconsistencies, and Individual Differences.
    Tiede KE; Gaissmaier W
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):803-820. PubMed ID: 37842816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does Iconicity in Pictographs Matter? The Influence of Iconicity and Numeracy on Information Processing, Decision Making, and Liking in an Eye-Tracking Study.
    Kreuzmair C; Siegrist M; Keller C
    Risk Anal; 2017 Mar; 37(3):546-556. PubMed ID: 27089046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Communicating global cardiovascular risk: are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?
    Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Garcia-Retamero R; Anam R; Rodriguez R; Sharit J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 23916416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The experience-based format of probability improves probability estimates: The moderating role of individual differences in numeracy.
    Traczyk J; Sobkow A; Matukiewicz A; Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R
    Int J Psychol; 2020 Apr; 55(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 30690731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should Health Numeracy Be Assessed Objectively or Subjectively?
    Dolan JG; Cherkasky OA; Li Q; Chin N; Veazie PJ
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Oct; 36(7):868-75. PubMed ID: 25948493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experienced Probabilities Increase Understanding of Diagnostic Test Results in Younger and Older Adults.
    Armstrong B; Spaniol J
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Aug; 37(6):670-679. PubMed ID: 28199179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Math anxiety, but not induced stress, is associated with objective numeracy.
    Choi SS; Taber JM; Thompson CA; Sidney PG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Dec; 26(4):604-619. PubMed ID: 32271051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.