These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30356811)

  • 1. Neural Correlate of Transition Violation and Deviance Detection in the Songbird Auditory Forebrain.
    Dong M; Vicario DS
    Front Syst Neurosci; 2018; 12():46. PubMed ID: 30356811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical learning of transition patterns in the songbird auditory forebrain.
    Dong M; Vicario DS
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7848. PubMed ID: 32398864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mismatch Responses Evoked by Sound Pattern Violation in the Songbird Forebrain Suggest Common Auditory Processing With Human.
    Mori C; Okanoya K
    Front Physiol; 2022; 13():822098. PubMed ID: 35309047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiar But Unexpected: Effects of Sound Context Statistics on Auditory Responses in the Songbird Forebrain.
    Lu K; Vicario DS
    J Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 37(49):12006-12017. PubMed ID: 29118103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical mapping of mismatch responses to independent acoustic features.
    An H; Auksztulewicz R; Kang H; Schnupp JWH
    Hear Res; 2021 Jan; 399():107894. PubMed ID: 31987647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neurons in macaque inferior temporal cortex show no surprise response to deviants in visual oddball sequences.
    Kaliukhovich DA; Vogels R
    J Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 34(38):12801-15. PubMed ID: 25232116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Roving oddball paradigm elicits sensory gating, frequency sensitivity, and long-latency response in common marmosets.
    O'Reilly JA
    IBRO Neurosci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11():128-136. PubMed ID: 34622244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specific Early and Late Oddball-Evoked Responses in Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons of Mouse Auditory Cortex.
    Chen IW; Helmchen F; Lütcke H
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(36):12560-73. PubMed ID: 26354921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic auditory processing of english words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm.
    Pettigrew CM; Murdoch BE; Ponton CW; Finnigan S; Alku P; Kei J; Sockalingam R; Chenery HJ
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):284-301. PubMed ID: 15179119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory predictions shape the neural responses to stimulus repetition and sensory change.
    Cacciaglia R; Costa-Faidella J; Zarnowiec K; Grimm S; Escera C
    Neuroimage; 2019 Feb; 186():200-210. PubMed ID: 30414982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hierarchical Deviant Processing in Auditory Cortex of Awake Mice.
    Luo D; Liu J; Auksztulewicz R; Wing Yip TK; Kanold PO; Schnupp JW
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36711896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subjective duration distortions mirror neural repetition suppression.
    Pariyadath V; Eagleman DM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e49362. PubMed ID: 23251340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transitional Probabilities Are Prioritized over Stimulus/Pattern Probabilities in Auditory Deviance Detection: Memory Basis for Predictive Sound Processing.
    Mittag M; Takegata R; Winkler I
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(37):9572-9. PubMed ID: 27629709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual mismatch responses index surprise signalling but not expectation suppression.
    Feuerriegel D; Yook J; Quek GL; Hogendoorn H; Bode S
    Cortex; 2021 Jan; 134():16-29. PubMed ID: 33249297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Principles of auditory processing differ between sensory and premotor structures of the songbird forebrain.
    Soyman E; Vicario DS
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):1266-1280. PubMed ID: 28031398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential deviant probability effects on two hierarchical levels of the auditory novelty system.
    López-Caballero F; Zarnowiec K; Escera C
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():1-9. PubMed ID: 27497593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of stimulus deviance within primate primary auditory cortex: intracortical mechanisms of mismatch negativity (MMN) generation.
    Javitt DC; Steinschneider M; Schroeder CE; Vaughan HG; Arezzo JC
    Brain Res; 1994 Dec; 667(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 7697356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate stimulus repetition abolishes stimulus expectation and surprise effects in fast periodic visual oddball designs.
    Feuerriegel D; Keage HAD; Rossion B; Quek GL
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Oct; 138():110-125. PubMed ID: 30208339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Neural Representation of a Repeated Standard Stimulus in Dyslexia.
    Beach SD; Ozernov-Palchik O; May SC; Centanni TM; Perrachione TK; Pantazis D; Gabrieli JDE
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():823627. PubMed ID: 35634200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early indices of deviance detection in humans and animal models.
    Grimm S; Escera C; Nelken I
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Apr; 116():23-7. PubMed ID: 26656286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.