347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30357358)
41. In silico prediction of chemical Ames mutagenicity.
Xu C; Cheng F; Chen L; Du Z; Li W; Liu G; Lee PW; Tang Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):2840-7. PubMed ID: 23030379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Merging applicability domains for in silico assessment of chemical mutagenicity.
Liu R; Wallqvist A
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Mar; 54(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 24494696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Principles and procedures for implementation of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses.
Amberg A; Beilke L; Bercu J; Bower D; Brigo A; Cross KP; Custer L; Dobo K; Dowdy E; Ford KA; Glowienke S; Van Gompel J; Harvey J; Hasselgren C; Honma M; Jolly R; Kemper R; Kenyon M; Kruhlak N; Leavitt P; Miller S; Muster W; Nicolette J; Plaper A; Powley M; Quigley DP; Reddy MV; Spirkl HP; Stavitskaya L; Teasdale A; Weiner S; Welch DS; White A; Wichard J; Myatt GJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():13-24. PubMed ID: 26877192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Three new consensus QSAR models for the prediction of Ames genotoxicity.
Votano JR; Parham M; Hall LH; Kier LB; Oloff S; Tropsha A; Xie Q; Tong W
Mutagenesis; 2004 Sep; 19(5):365-77. PubMed ID: 15388809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Characterization and validation of an in silico toxicology model to predict the mutagenic potential of drug impurities.
Valerio LG; Cross KP
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2012 May; 260(3):209-21. PubMed ID: 22426359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Applicability domains for classification problems: Benchmarking of distance to models for Ames mutagenicity set.
Sushko I; Novotarskyi S; Körner R; Pandey AK; Cherkasov A; Li J; Gramatica P; Hansen K; Schroeter T; Müller KR; Xi L; Liu H; Yao X; Öberg T; Hormozdiari F; Dao P; Sahinalp C; Todeschini R; Polishchuk P; Artemenko A; Kuz'min V; Martin TM; Young DM; Fourches D; Muratov E; Tropsha A; Baskin I; Horvath D; Marcou G; Muller C; Varnek A; Prokopenko VV; Tetko IV
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2094-111. PubMed ID: 21033656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. New Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models Improve Predictability of Ames Mutagenicity for Aromatic Azo Compounds.
Manganelli S; Benfenati E; Manganaro A; Kulkarni S; Barton-Maclaren TS; Honma M
Toxicol Sci; 2016 Oct; 153(2):316-26. PubMed ID: 27413112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Benchmark data set for in silico prediction of Ames mutagenicity.
Hansen K; Mika S; Schroeter T; Sutter A; ter Laak A; Steger-Hartmann T; Heinrich N; Müller KR
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2077-81. PubMed ID: 19702240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. It's difficult, but important, to make negative predictions.
Williams RV; Amberg A; Brigo A; Coquin L; Giddings A; Glowienke S; Greene N; Jolly R; Kemper R; O'Leary-Steele C; Parenty A; Spirkl HP; Stalford SA; Weiner SK; Wichard J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 76():79-86. PubMed ID: 26785392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. In silico assessment of genotoxicity. Combinations of sensitive structural alerts minimize false negative predictions for all genotoxicity endpoints and can single out chemicals for which experimentation can be avoided.
Benigni R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Nov; 126():105042. PubMed ID: 34506881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. In silico prediction of chromosome damage: comparison of three (Q)SAR models.
Morita T; Shigeta Y; Kawamura T; Fujita Y; Honda H; Honma M
Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 30085209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Hydromorphone impurity 2,2-bishydromorphone does not exert mutagenic and clastogenic properties via
Franckenstein D; Bothe MK; Hurtado SB; Westphal M
Drug Chem Toxicol; 2023 Nov; 46(4):634-639. PubMed ID: 35603474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. QSAR models to predict mutagenicity of acrylates, methacrylates and alpha,beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds.
Pérez-Garrido A; Helguera AM; Rodríguez FG; Cordeiro MN
Dent Mater; 2010 May; 26(5):397-415. PubMed ID: 20122717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. QSAR modeling for predicting mutagenic toxicity of diverse chemicals for regulatory purposes.
Basant N; Gupta S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jun; 24(16):14430-14444. PubMed ID: 28435990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of the computer programs DEREK and TOPKAT to predict bacterial mutagenicity. Deductive Estimate of Risk from Existing Knowledge. Toxicity Prediction by Komputer Assisted Technology.
Cariello NF; Wilson JD; Britt BH; Wedd DJ; Burlinson B; Gombar V
Mutagenesis; 2002 Jul; 17(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 12110629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prioritization of mycotoxins based on mutagenicity and carcinogenicity evaluation using combined in silico QSAR methods.
Lemée P; Fessard V; Habauzit D
Environ Pollut; 2023 Apr; 323():121284. PubMed ID: 36804886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of the OECD QSAR Application Toolbox and Toxtree for estimating the mutagenicity of chemicals. Part 1. Aromatic amines.
Devillers J; Mombelli E
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):753-69. PubMed ID: 21120760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Use of in silico systems and expert knowledge for structure-based assessment of potentially mutagenic impurities.
Sutter A; Amberg A; Boyer S; Brigo A; Contrera JF; Custer LL; Dobo KL; Gervais V; Glowienke S; van Gompel J; Greene N; Muster W; Nicolette J; Reddy MV; Thybaud V; Vock E; White AT; Müller L
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 67(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 23669331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. In silico prediction of the mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds using a novel two-QSAR approach.
Ding YL; Lyu YC; Leong MK
Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Apr; 40():102-114. PubMed ID: 28027902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
