These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30357614)

  • 41. Animates engender robust memory representations in adults and young children.
    Loucks J; Verrett K; Reise B
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104284. PubMed ID: 32276235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Animate and inanimate objects in human visual cortex: Evidence for task-independent category effects.
    Wiggett AJ; Pritchard IC; Downing PE
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Dec; 47(14):3111-7. PubMed ID: 19631673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Adaptive memory: identifying the proximate roots of the survival processing advantage.
    Otgaar H; Jelicic M; Smeets T
    J Psychol; 2015; 149(3-4):339-55. PubMed ID: 25901634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
    Geraci L; Manzano I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evidence for the differential salience of disgust and fear in episodic memory.
    Chapman HA; Johannes K; Poppenk JL; Moscovitch M; Anderson AK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1100-12. PubMed ID: 23067064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Analyzing the structure of animacy: Exploring relationships among six new animacy and 15 existing normative dimensions for 1,200 concrete nouns.
    VanArsdall JE; Blunt JR
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):997-1012. PubMed ID: 35088295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effects of study task on prestimulus subsequent memory effects in the hippocampus.
    de Chastelaine M; Rugg MD
    Hippocampus; 2015 Nov; 25(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 26135908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Animate Objects are Detected More Frequently than Inanimate Objects in Inattentional Blindness Tasks Independently of Threat.
    Calvillo DP; Hawkins WC
    J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(2):101-15. PubMed ID: 27055078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sensitive maintenance: a cognitive process underlying individual differences in memory for threatening information.
    Peters JH; Hock M; Krohne HW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):200-13. PubMed ID: 22082061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Psychophysiological evidence for the role of emotion in adaptive memory.
    Fiacconi CM; Dekraker J; Köhler S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Oct; 144(5):925-33. PubMed ID: 26280160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Recognition memory for valenced and arousing materials under conditions of divided attention.
    Clark-Foos A; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2008; 16(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 18569681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Inhibitory control in memory: evidence for negative priming in free recall.
    Marsh JE; Beaman CP; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1377-88. PubMed ID: 22468802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The role of perceived threat in the survival processing memory advantage.
    Olds JM; Lanska M; Westerman DL
    Memory; 2014; 22(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 23786410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reward anticipation modulates the effect of stress-related increases in cortisol on episodic memory.
    Quent JA; McCullough AM; Sazma M; Wolf OT; Yonelinas AP
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2018 Jan; 147():65-73. PubMed ID: 29175514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.
    Loaiza VM; McCabe DP; Youngblood JL; Rose NS; Myerson J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1258-63. PubMed ID: 21707214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Adaptive memory: the survival scenario enhances item-specific processing relative to a moving scenario.
    Burns DJ; Hart J; Griffith SE; Burns AD
    Memory; 2013; 21(6):695-706. PubMed ID: 23259675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The impact of cognitive load on delayed recall.
    Camos V; Portrat S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1029-34. PubMed ID: 25421406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Fit to last: Exploring the longevity of the survival processing effect.
    Clark DP; Bruno D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1164-78. PubMed ID: 26223150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Adaptive memory: determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing.
    Burns DJ; Burns SA; Hwang AJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):206-18. PubMed ID: 21244114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Memory and conceptual learning of relevant and non-relevant items in item-method directed forgetting.
    Orghian D; Garcia-Marques L; Marques P; Braga J
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1233-1243. PubMed ID: 29471712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.