These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30357797)

  • 1. Biomechanical Properties of the 1.5 mm Locking Compression Plate: Comparison with the 1.5 and 2.0 mm Straight Plates in Compression and Torsion.
    Watrous GK; Moens NMM; Runciman J; Gibson TWG
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2018 Nov; 31(6):438-444. PubMed ID: 30357797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual Bone Fixation: A Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Implant Constructs in a Mid-Diaphyseal Fracture Model of the Feline Radius and Ulna.
    Preston TJ; Glyde M; Hosgood G; Day RE
    Vet Surg; 2016 Apr; 45(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 27007749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of a 3.5 mm locking compression plate applied cranially and a 2.7 mm locking compression plate applied medially in a gap model of the distal aspect of the canine radius.
    Uhl JM; Kapatkin AS; Garcia TC; Stover SM
    Vet Surg; 2013 Oct; 42(7):840-6. PubMed ID: 24033354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A biomechanical comparison of 3.5 locking compression plate fixation to 3.5 limited contact dynamic compression plate fixation in a canine cadaveric distal humeral metaphyseal gap model.
    Filipowicz D; Lanz O; McLaughlin R; Elder S; Werre S
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2009; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19597629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of mono- and bicortical screws in an experimentally induced gap fracture.
    Demner D; Garcia TC; Serdy MG; Hayashi K; Nir BA; Stover SM
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2014; 27(6):422-9. PubMed ID: 25327936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of conventional compression plates and locking compression plates using cantilever bending in an ilial fracture model.
    Bruce CW; Gibson TW; Runciman RJ
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2014; 27(6):430-5. PubMed ID: 25345445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical Comparison of a Notched Head Locking T-Plate and a Straight Locking Compression Plate in a Juxta-Articular Fracture Model.
    Bird G; Glyde M; Hosgood G; Hayes A; Day R
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2021 May; 34(3):161-170. PubMed ID: 33249549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contat dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate.
    Aguila AZ; Manos JM; Orlansky AS; Todhunter RJ; Trotter EJ; Van der Meulen MC
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2005; 18(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 16594390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of a 3.5-mm conical coupling plating system and a 3.5-mm locking compression plate applied as plate-rod constructs to an experimentally created fracture gap in femurs of canine cadavers.
    Tremolada G; Lewis DD; Paragnani KL; Conrad BP; Kim SE; Pozzi A
    Am J Vet Res; 2017 Jun; 78(6):712-717. PubMed ID: 28541152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The mechanical behavior of locking compression plates compared with dynamic compression plates in a cadaver radius model.
    Gardner MJ; Brophy RH; Campbell D; Mahajan A; Wright TM; Helfet DL; Lorich DG
    J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Oct; 19(9):597-603. PubMed ID: 16247303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 3.5 string of pearl plate fixation to 3.5 locking compression plate fixation in a canine fracture gap model.
    Malenfant RC; Sod GA
    Vet Surg; 2014 May; 43(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 24720361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A mechanical comparison of equine proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis techniques: an axial locking compression plate and two abaxial transarticular cortical screws versus an axial dynamic compression plate and two abaxial transarticular cortical screws.
    Sod GA; Riggs LM; Mitchell CF; Martin GS
    Vet Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(5):571-8. PubMed ID: 21521241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do Transcortical Screws in a Locking Plate Construct Improve the Stiffness in the Fixation of Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures? A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Different Plating Constructs.
    Lochab J; Carrothers A; Wong E; McLachlin S; Aldebeyan W; Jenkinson R; Whyne C; Nousiainen MT
    J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Jan; 31(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 28002219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of intramedullary pin size and monocortical screw configuration on locking compression plate-rod constructs in an in vitro fracture gap model.
    Pearson T; Glyde M; Hosgood G; Day R
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 25633043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison of two locking plate constructs under cyclic torsional loading in a fracture gap model. Two screws versus three screws per fragment.
    Bilmont A; Palierne S; Verset M; Swider P; Autefage A
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 26219753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical comparison of a locking compression plate combined with an intramedullary pin or a polyetheretherketone rod in a cadaveric canine tibia gap model.
    Beierer LH; Glyde M; Day RE; Hosgood GL
    Vet Surg; 2014 Nov; 43(8):1032-8. PubMed ID: 25132257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Compression Plate and Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate Combined with an Intramedullary Rod in a Canine Femoral Fracture-Gap Model.
    Matres-Lorenzo L; Diop A; Maurel N; Boucton MC; Bernard F; Bernardé A
    Vet Surg; 2016 Apr; 45(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 26909507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distal Ulna Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plating Constructs.
    Collins M; Hart A; Hines J; Steffen T; Harvey EJ; Martineau PA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Aug; 28(8):470-5. PubMed ID: 24121982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical Comparison of Two Locking Plate Constructs for the Stabilization of Feline Tibial Fractures.
    Hottmann NM; Johnson MD; Banks SA; Tuyn D; Lewis DD
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 33(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 31858511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
    Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
    Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.