These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30357814)

  • 1. Longitudinal and time-to-drop-out joint models can lead to seriously biased estimates when the drop-out mechanism is at random.
    Thomadakis C; Meligkotsidou L; Pantazis N; Touloumi G
    Biometrics; 2019 Mar; 75(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 30357814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of missing data due to drop-outs on estimators for rates of change in longitudinal studies: a simulation study.
    Touloumi G; Babiker AG; Pocock SJ; Darbyshire JH
    Stat Med; 2001 Dec; 20(24):3715-28. PubMed ID: 11782028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misspecifying the covariance structure in a linear mixed model under MAR drop-out.
    Thomadakis C; Meligkotsidou L; Pantazis N; Touloumi G
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(23):3027-3041. PubMed ID: 32452081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Issues with the expected information matrix of linear mixed models provided by popular statistical packages under missingness at random dropout.
    Thomadakis C; Pantazis N; Touloumi G
    Stat Med; 2023 Jul; 42(16):2873-2885. PubMed ID: 37094843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joint Longitudinal Models for Dealing With Missing at Random Data in Trial-Based Economic Evaluations.
    Gabrio A; Hunter R; Mason AJ; Baio G
    Value Health; 2021 May; 24(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 33933239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation study.
    Marshall A; Altman DG; Royston P; Holder RL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jan; 10():7. PubMed ID: 20085642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian Latent Variable Selection Model for Nonignorable Missingness.
    Du H; Enders C; Keller BT; Bradbury TN; Karney BR
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):478-512. PubMed ID: 33529056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment effects in randomized longitudinal trials with different types of nonignorable dropout.
    Yang M; Maxwell SE
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Jun; 19(2):188-210. PubMed ID: 24079928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A hybrid return to baseline imputation method to incorporate MAR and MNAR dropout missingness.
    Jin M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2022 Sep; 120():106859. PubMed ID: 35872135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation and comparison of rates of change in longitudinal studies with informative drop-outs.
    Touloumi G; Pocock SJ; Babiker AG; Darbyshire JH
    Stat Med; 1999 May; 18(10):1215-33. PubMed ID: 10363341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the Choice of Longitudinal Models for the Analysis of Antitumor Efficacy in Mouse Clinical Trials of Patient-derived Xenograft Models.
    Savel H; Barbier S; Proust-Lima C; Rondeau V; Thiébaut R; Meyer-Losic F; Richert L
    Cancer Res Commun; 2023 Jan; 3(1):140-147. PubMed ID: 36968232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correction of bias from non-random missing longitudinal data using auxiliary information.
    Wang C; Hall CB
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(6):671-9. PubMed ID: 20029935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of weighted estimating equations for longitudinal binary data with drop-outs missing at random.
    Preisser JS; Lohman KK; Rathouz PJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3035-54. PubMed ID: 12369080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bias in longitudinal data analysis with missing data using typical linear mixed-effects modelling and pattern-mixture approach: an analytical illustration.
    Yang M; Wang L; Maxwell SE
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):246-67. PubMed ID: 25098455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biased estimation with shared parameter models in the presence of competing dropout mechanisms.
    Vonesh EF; Greene T
    Biometrics; 2022 Mar; 78(1):399-406. PubMed ID: 33592109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a weighting approach for performing sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation.
    Rezvan PH; White IR; Lee KJ; Carlin JB; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():83. PubMed ID: 26464305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Missing data imputation in clinical trials using recurrent neural network facilitated by clustering and oversampling.
    Haliduola HN; Bretz F; Mansmann U
    Biom J; 2022 Jun; 64(5):863-882. PubMed ID: 35266565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors.
    Galimard JE; Chevret S; Curis E; Resche-Rigon M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):90. PubMed ID: 30170561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Missing not at random models for latent growth curve analyses.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Mar; 16(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 21381816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BayesMetab: treatment of missing values in metabolomic studies using a Bayesian modeling approach.
    Shah J; Brock GN; Gaskins J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 24):673. PubMed ID: 31861984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.