These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30358042)

  • 1. Experts vs super-experts: differences in automated performance metrics and clinical outcomes for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Hung AJ; Oh PJ; Chen J; Ghodoussipour S; Lane C; Jarc A; Gill IS
    BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):861-868. PubMed ID: 30358042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Crowdsourced versus expert evaluations of the vesico-urethral anastomosis in the robotic radical prostatectomy: is one superior at discriminating differences in automated performance metrics?
    Oh PJ; Chen J; Hatcher D; Djaladat H; Hung AJ
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):705-711. PubMed ID: 29713932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and Validation of Objective Performance Metrics for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Pilot Study.
    Hung AJ; Chen J; Jarc A; Hatcher D; Djaladat H; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2018 Jan; 199(1):296-304. PubMed ID: 28765067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of surgeon experience and bony pelvic dimensions on surgical performance and patient outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Chen J; Chu T; Ghodoussipour S; Bowman S; Patel H; King K; Hung AJ
    BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124(5):828-835. PubMed ID: 31265207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgeon-led prostate cancer lymph node staging: pathological outcomes stratified by robot-assisted dissection templates and patient selection.
    Altok M; Babaian K; Achim MF; Achim GC; Troncoso P; Matin SF; Chapin BF; Davis JW
    BJU Int; 2018 Jul; 122(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 29446205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A deep-learning model using automated performance metrics and clinical features to predict urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Hung AJ; Chen J; Ghodoussipour S; Oh PJ; Liu Z; Nguyen J; Purushotham S; Gill IS; Liu Y
    BJU Int; 2019 Sep; 124(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 30811828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of Automated Performance Metrics to Measure Surgeon Performance during Robotic Vesicourethral Anastomosis and Methodical Development of a Training Tutorial.
    Chen J; Oh PJ; Cheng N; Shah A; Montez J; Jarc A; Guo L; Gill IS; Hung AJ
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):895-902. PubMed ID: 29792882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utilizing Machine Learning and Automated Performance Metrics to Evaluate Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performance and Predict Outcomes.
    Hung AJ; Chen J; Che Z; Nilanon T; Jarc A; Titus M; Oh PJ; Gill IS; Liu Y
    J Endourol; 2018 May; 32(5):438-444. PubMed ID: 29448809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporation and validation of clinically relevant performance metrics of simulation (CRPMS) into a novel full-immersion simulation platform for nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (NS-RARP) utilizing three-dimensional printing and hydrogel casting technology.
    Witthaus MW; Farooq S; Melnyk R; Campbell T; Saba P; Mathews E; Ezzat B; Ertefaie A; Frye TP; Wu G; Rashid H; Joseph JV; Ghazi A
    BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):322-332. PubMed ID: 31677325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of clinical outcomes and automated performance metrics in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with and without trainee involvement.
    Chen A; Ghodoussipour S; Titus MB; Nguyen JH; Chen J; Ma R; Hung AJ
    World J Urol; 2020 Jul; 38(7):1615-1621. PubMed ID: 31728671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival Analysis Using Surgeon Skill Metrics and Patient Factors to Predict Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Trinh L; Mingo S; Vanstrum EB; Sanford DI; Aastha ; Ma R; Nguyen JH; Liu Y; Hung AJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Mar; 8(2):623-630. PubMed ID: 33858811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Locally-advanced Prostate Cancer.
    Gandaglia G; De Lorenzis E; Novara G; Fossati N; De Groote R; Dovey Z; Suardi N; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Rocco B; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2017 Feb; 71(2):249-256. PubMed ID: 27209538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): results from the ERUS Scientific and Educational Working Groups Metrics Initiative.
    Mottrie A; Mazzone E; Wiklund P; Graefen M; Collins JW; De Groote R; Dell'Oglio P; Puliatti S; Gallagher AG
    BJU Int; 2021 Jul; 128(1):103-111. PubMed ID: 33251703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Australian laparoscopic non robotic radical prostatectomy experience - analysis of 2943 cases (USANZ supplement).
    Louie-Johnsun MW; Handmer MM; Calopedos RJ; Chabert C; Cohen RJ; Gianduzzo TR; Kearns PA; Moon DA; Ooi J; Shannon T; Sofield D; Tan AH
    BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118 Suppl 3():43-48. PubMed ID: 27659257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Cimen HI; Atik YT; Altinova S; Adsan O; Balbay MD
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 30521164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system: surgical technique and results of the first human trial.
    Chang KD; Abdel Raheem A; Choi YD; Chung BH; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2018 Sep; 122(3):441-448. PubMed ID: 29645348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Community-based Outcomes of Open versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Herlemann A; Cowan JE; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
    Eur Urol; 2018 Feb; 73(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 28499617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era.
    Truesdale MD; Lee DJ; Cheetham PJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Badani KK
    J Endourol; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1055-60. PubMed ID: 20575697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.