These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30358801)

  • 1. Propensity Score-Based Estimators With Multiple Error-Prone Covariates.
    Hong H; Aaby DA; Siddique J; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):222-230. PubMed ID: 30358801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An imputation-based solution to using mismeasured covariates in propensity score analysis.
    Webb-Vargas Y; Rudolph KE; Lenis D; Murakami P; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1824-1837. PubMed ID: 26037527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian Approach for Addressing Differential Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.
    Hong H; Rudolph KE; Stuart EA
    Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):1078-1096. PubMed ID: 27738956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When does measurement error in covariates impact causal effect estimates? Analytic derivations of different scenarios and an empirical illustration.
    Sengewald MA; Steiner PM; Pohl S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 May; 72(2):244-270. PubMed ID: 30345554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
    Qu Y; Lipkovich I
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Sensitivity Analyses for Unobserved Confounding to Address Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.
    Rudolph KE; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 187(3):604-613. PubMed ID: 28992211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
    Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference.
    Shortreed SM; Ertefaie A
    Biometrics; 2017 Dec; 73(4):1111-1122. PubMed ID: 28273693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Stuart EA; Lee BK; Leacy FP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S84-S90.e1. PubMed ID: 23849158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis.
    Choi J; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 34(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 30341708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure.
    Coffman DL; Zhou J; Cai X
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):168. PubMed ID: 32586271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of bias in propensity score-adjusted non-linear regression models.
    Wan F; Mitra N
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):846-862. PubMed ID: 27095754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compensation and Amplification of Attenuation Bias in Causal Effect Estimates.
    Sengewald MA; Pohl S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):589-610. PubMed ID: 30915587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model averaged double robust estimation.
    Cefalu M; Dominici F; Arvold N; Parmigiani G
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):410-421. PubMed ID: 27893927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using audit information to adjust parameter estimates for data errors in clinical trials.
    Shepherd BE; Shaw PA; Dodd LE
    Clin Trials; 2012 Dec; 9(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 22848072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.
    Kyle RP; Moodie EE; Klein MB; Abrahamowicz M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 184(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 27416840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-step estimation in ratio-of-mediator-probability weighted causal mediation analysis.
    Bein E; Deutsch J; Hong G; Porter KE; Qin X; Yang C
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(8):1304-1324. PubMed ID: 29322536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.