509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30359226)
1. Synthesising conceptual frameworks for patient and public involvement in research - a critical appraisal of a meta-narrative review.
Evans D; Hopewell-Kelly N; Kok M; White J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):116. PubMed ID: 30359226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protocol--realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES).
Greenhalgh T; Wong G; Westhorp G; Pawson R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Aug; 11():115. PubMed ID: 21843376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews.
Wong G; Greenhalgh T; Westhorp G; Buckingham J; Pawson R
BMC Med; 2013 Jan; 11():20. PubMed ID: 23360661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews.
Wong G; Greenhalgh T; Westhorp G; Buckingham J; Pawson R
J Adv Nurs; 2013 May; 69(5):987-1004. PubMed ID: 23356699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in evidence synthesis: how the PatMed study approached embedding audience responses into the expression of a meta-ethnography.
Park S; Khan N; Stevenson F; Malpass A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):29. PubMed ID: 32041523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses.
Wong G; Greenhalgh T; Westhorp G; Buckingham J; Pawson R
BMC Med; 2013 Jan; 11():21. PubMed ID: 23360677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal.
Gough D
BMC Med; 2013 Jan; 11():22. PubMed ID: 23360691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perspective on Systematic Medical Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Pepose JS; Foulks GN; Nelson JD; Erickson S; Lemp MA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 211():15-21. PubMed ID: 31811861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: Review of literature.
Akhigbe T; Zolnourian A; Bulters D
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 May; 39():45-48. PubMed ID: 28246008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Meta-analyses (QUOROM)].
Urrutia G; Tort S; Bonfill X;
Med Clin (Barc); 2005 Dec; 125 Suppl 1():32-7. PubMed ID: 16464425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The development and validation of a meta-tool for quality appraisal of public health evidence: Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT).
Rosella L; Bowman C; Pach B; Morgan S; Fitzpatrick T; Goel V
Public Health; 2016 Jul; 136():57-65. PubMed ID: 26993202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overview authors rarely defined systematic reviews that are included in their overviews.
Faggion CM; Diaz KT
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 May; 109():70-79. PubMed ID: 30684566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.
Hempel S; Shekelle PG; Liu JL; Sherwood Danz M; Foy R; Lim YW; Motala A; Rubenstein LV
BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Dec; 24(12):796-804. PubMed ID: 26311020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomedical and public health reviews and meta-analyses in Ethiopia had poor methodological quality: overview of evidence from 1970 to 2018.
Habtewold TD; Alemu SM; Mohammed SH; Endalamaw A; Mohammed MA; Teferra AA; Tura AK; Asefa NG; Tegegne BS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 May; 109():90-98. PubMed ID: 30721723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017.
Rombey T; Allers K; Mathes T; Hoffmann F; Pieper D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 30866832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.
Kynoch K; Chang A; Coyer F; McArdle A
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Mar; 14(3):181-234. PubMed ID: 27532144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the quality of reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.
Xu C; Liu TZ; Jia PL; Liu Y; Li L; Cheng LL; Sun X
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):157. PubMed ID: 30497389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
