These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30359651)
1. Electrophysiological correlates of active suppression and attentional selection in preview visual search. Berggren N; Eimer M Neuropsychologia; 2018 Nov; 120():75-85. PubMed ID: 30359651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P Kerzel D; Burra N J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual search in temporally segregated displays: converging operations in the study of the preview benefit. Belopolsky AV; Peterson MS; Kramer AF Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 16099358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects. Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. P Drisdelle BL; Eimer M Psychophysiology; 2021 Sep; 58(9):e13878. PubMed ID: 34110022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking. Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Category-based guidance of spatial attention during visual search for feature conjunctions. Nako R; Grubert A; Eimer M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1571-86. PubMed ID: 27213833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the electrophysiological evidence for the capture of visual attention. McDonald JJ; Green JJ; Jannati A; Di Lollo V J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 23163789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional Access to Multiple Target Objects in Visual Search. Berggren N; Eimer M J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 32(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 31560272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Hilimire MR; Mounts JR; Parks NA; Corballis PM Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 21457759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attentional processing of multiple targets and distractors. Munneke J; Fait E; Mazza V Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1104-8. PubMed ID: 23902254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts. Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search. Berggren N; Eimer M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]