368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30359783)
1. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction.
Wu J; Ye T; Lv J; He Z; Zhu J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):417-426.e6. PubMed ID: 30359783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy on Bladder Function Recovery.
Liu Q; Li P; Sun Y; Zhang S; Liu K
J Invest Surg; 2020 Apr; 33(4):381-386. PubMed ID: 30380342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: description of technique and outcomes.
Liang Z; Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 20673971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic nerve‑sparing radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Ma L; Li Q; Guo Y; Tan X; Wang M; Qi Q
World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 19(1):301. PubMed ID: 34657619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Carcinoma: Emphasis on Nerve Content in Removed Cardinal Ligaments.
Shi R; Wei W; Jiang P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jan; 26(1):192-8. PubMed ID: 26569055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Duan D; Liu B; Li L
J BUON; 2020; 25(2):743-749. PubMed ID: 32521862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).
Kietpeerakool C; Aue-Aungkul A; Galaal K; Ngamjarus C; Lumbiganon P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 2(2):CD012828. PubMed ID: 30746689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
Kim HS; Kim K; Ryoo SB; Seo JH; Kim SY; Park JW; Kim MA; Hong KS; Jeong CW; Song YS;
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 25872891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy on bladder function, intestinal function recovery and quality of sexual life in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Chen L; Zhang WN; Zhang SM; Yang ZH; Zhang P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(24):10971-5. PubMed ID: 25605211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Liu Z; Li X; Tao Y; Li W; Yang Y; Yao Y; Zhu T
Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():54-8. PubMed ID: 26632655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Bogani G; Sturla D; Serati M; Bolis P
Surg Innov; 2013 Oct; 20(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 23339145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Conventional Radical Hysterectomy Versus 2 Nerve-Sparing Modalities for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.
van Gent MDJM; Rademaker M; van der Veer JCB; van Poelgeest MIE; Gaarenstroom KN; Putter H; Trimbos JBMZ; de Kroon CD
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Oct; 27(8):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 28704329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of early postoperative bladder catheter removal without prior bladder-training exercises after laparoscopic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy.
Gaballa K; Denewer A; Khater A; Gallotta V; Conte C; Federico A; Elfeki H; Scambia G
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 39(6):788-792. PubMed ID: 31006315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Long Y; Yao DS; Pan XW; Ou TY
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94116. PubMed ID: 24748015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhao Y; Hang B; Xiong GW; Zhang XW
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1132-1144. PubMed ID: 28300465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
