These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30360917)

  • 1. Influence of age on the effects of lying on memory.
    Paige LE; Fields EC; Gutchess A
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Jul; 133():42-53. PubMed ID: 30360917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating heart rate variability as a predictor of the influence of lying on memory.
    Paige LE; Wolf JM; Gutchess A
    Memory; 2022 Aug; 30(7):785-795. PubMed ID: 33258409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive processes during deception about attitudes revisited: a replication study.
    Scheuble V; Beauducel A
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 15(8):839-848. PubMed ID: 32820342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological markers of working memory usage as an index for truth-based lies.
    Lo YH; Tseng P
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 18(6):1089-1104. PubMed ID: 30022430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
    Carrión RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can you catch a liar? How negative emotions affect brain responses when lying or telling the truth.
    Proverbio AM; Vanutelli ME; Adorni R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59383. PubMed ID: 23536874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(7):878-901. PubMed ID: 14998703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The processes leading to deception: ERP spatiotemporal principal component analysis and source analysis.
    Sun SY; Mai X; Liu C; Liu JY; Luo YJ
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(4):348-59. PubMed ID: 21225491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cognitive mechanisms underlying deception: an event-related potential study.
    Suchotzki K; Crombez G; Smulders FT; Meijer E; Verschuere B
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):395-405. PubMed ID: 25661698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The deceptive response: effects of response conflict and strategic monitoring on the late positive component and episodic memory-related brain activity.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Biol Psychol; 2003 Nov; 64(3):217-53. PubMed ID: 14630405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deception and the misinformation effect: an event-related potential study.
    Meek SW; Phillips MC; Boswell CP; Vendemia JM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jan; 87(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 23183315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring time- and frequency- dependent functional connectivity and brain networks during deception with single-trial event-related potentials.
    Gao JF; Yang Y; Huang WT; Lin P; Ge S; Zheng HM; Gu LY; Zhou H; Li CH; Rao NN
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37065. PubMed ID: 27833159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
    Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The motor cost of telling lies: electrocortical signatures and personality foundations of spontaneous deception.
    Panasiti MS; Pavone EF; Mancini A; Merla A; Grisoni L; Aglioti SM
    Soc Neurosci; 2014; 9(6):573-89. PubMed ID: 24979665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An event-related potential study of deception to self preferences.
    Tu S; Li H; Jou J; Zhang Q; Wang T; Yu C; Qiu J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():142-8. PubMed ID: 18952072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of conflict processing mechanism in deception responses.
    Wu J; Huang J; Li J; Chen X; Xiao Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):18300. PubMed ID: 36316417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal course of executive control when lying about self- and other-referential information: an ERP study.
    Hu X; Wu H; Fu G
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1369():149-57. PubMed ID: 21059343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Telling a truth to deceive: Examining executive control and reward-related processes underlying interpersonal deception.
    Sai L; Wu H; Hu X; Fu G
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Aug; 125():149-156. PubMed ID: 29990705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.