These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30361112)
1. Standardization of operative technique in minimally invasive right hepatectomy: improving cost-value relationship through value stream mapping in hepatobiliary surgery. Jajja MR; Maxwell D; Hashmi SS; Meltzer RS; Lin E; Sweeney JF; Sarmiento JM HPB (Oxford); 2019 May; 21(5):566-573. PubMed ID: 30361112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic or laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy after open hepatectomy: a cohort study. Birgin E; Abdelhadi S; Seyfried S; Rasbach E; Rahbari M; Téoule P; Reißfelder C; Rahbari NN Surg Endosc; 2024 Mar; 38(3):1296-1305. PubMed ID: 38102396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low conversion rate during minimally invasive major hepatectomy: Ten-year experience at a high-volume center. Jajja MR; Tariq M; Maxwell DW; Hashmi SS; Lin E; Sarmiento JM Am J Surg; 2019 Jan; 217(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 30180935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic vs open right hepatectomy: a value-based analysis. Medbery RL; Chadid TS; Sweeney JF; Knechtle SJ; Kooby DA; Maithel SK; Lin E; Sarmiento JM J Am Coll Surg; 2014 May; 218(5):929-39. PubMed ID: 24680574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive versus open right hepatectomy: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis. Duarte VC; Coelho FF; Valverde A; Danoussou D; Kruger JAP; Zuber K; Fonseca GM; Jeismann VB; Herman P; Lupinacci RM BMC Surg; 2020 Oct; 20(1):260. PubMed ID: 33126885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical advantages of single port laparoscopic hepatectomy. Han JH; You YK; Choi HJ; Hong TH; Kim DG World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 24(3):379-386. PubMed ID: 29391760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and cost of robotic hepatectomy: is the robot cost-prohibitive? Sham JG; Richards MK; Seo YD; Pillarisetty VG; Yeung RS; Park JO J Robot Surg; 2016 Dec; 10(4):307-313. PubMed ID: 27153838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Less cost by using hanging maneuver and Pringle maneuver in left lateral hepatectomy through small laparotomy wound--experience of Southern Taiwan. Lin TL; Alikhanov R; Kuo SC; Li WF; Chen CL; Wang SH; Lin CC; Liu YW; Yong CC; Lin YH; Wang CC World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 14(1):6. PubMed ID: 26746427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unravelling the Complexity Myth for Minimally Invasive Right Hepatectomy: Liver Parenchymal Features and their Correlation to Objective Outcomes in Major Anatomical Resections. Hashmi SS; Jajja MR; Nadeem SO; Maxwell DW; Eckhoff AM; Lin E; Sarmiento JM World J Surg; 2021 Aug; 45(8):2529-2537. PubMed ID: 33866426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Financial Impact of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Costs Between the Robotic and Open Technique in a Single Institution. Daskalaki D; Gonzalez-Heredia R; Brown M; Bianco FM; Tzvetanov I; Davis M; Kim J; Benedetti E; Giulianotti PC J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Apr; 27(4):375-382. PubMed ID: 28186429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive surgery versus open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: A systematic review and meta analysis. Lei J; Huang J; Yang X; Zhang Y; Yao K Int J Surg; 2018 Mar; 51():191-198. PubMed ID: 29360613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic liver donor right hepatectomy: A pure, minimally invasive approach. Chen PD; Wu CY; Hu RH; Ho CM; Lee PH; Lai HS; Lin MT; Wu YM Liver Transpl; 2016 Nov; 22(11):1509-1518. PubMed ID: 27509325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Keller DS; Delaney CP; Hashemi L; Haas EM Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4220-8. PubMed ID: 26715021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The feasibility and efficacy of pure laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy. Ome Y; Hashida K; Yokota M; Nagahisa Y; Yamaguchi K; Okabe M; Kawamoto K Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3474-3479. PubMed ID: 29344784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy-a cost analysis after propensity score matching. Wabitsch S; Kästner A; Haber PK; Feldbrügge L; Winklmann T; Werner S; Pratschke J; Schmelzle M Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2019 Jun; 404(4):469-475. PubMed ID: 31065781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nationwide standardization of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for colon cancer and development and validation of a video-based competency assessment tool (the Right study). Grüter AAJ; Toorenvliet BR; Belgers EHJ; Belt EJT; van Duijvendijk P; Hoff C; Hompes R; Smits AB; van de Ven AWH; van Westreenen HL; Bonjer HJ; Tanis PJ; Tuynman JB; Br J Surg; 2024 Jan; 111(1):. PubMed ID: 38103184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Outcome and Cost Analysis Comparing Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Intraoperative Fluoroscopy versus Computed Tomography-Guided Navigation. Khanna R; McDevitt JL; Abecassis ZA; Smith ZA; Koski TR; Fessler RG; Dahdaleh NS World Neurosurg; 2016 Oct; 94():255-260. PubMed ID: 27423195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry. McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]