These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30361668)

  • 1. Glass ionomer or composite resin for primary molars.
    Jones G; Taylor G
    Evid Based Dent; 2018 Oct; 19(3):86-87. PubMed ID: 30361668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP
    J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.
    Dorri M; Martinez-Zapata MJ; Walsh T; Marinho VC; Sheiham Deceased A; Zaror C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD008072. PubMed ID: 29284075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study.
    Hatirli H; Yasa B; Çelik EU
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5493-5503. PubMed ID: 33683465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
    Ersin NK; Candan U; Aykut A; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
    Hübel S; Mejàre I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival of Adhesive Restorations for Primary Molars: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Clinical Trials.
    Santos AP; Moreira IK; Scarpelli AC; Pordeus IA; Paiva SM; Martins CC
    Pediatr Dent; 2016 Oct; 38(5):370-378. PubMed ID: 28206891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The preventive effect of glass ionomer restorations on new caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ge KX; Quock R; Chu CH; Yu OY
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104272. PubMed ID: 36038075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term clinical performance of heat-cured high-viscosity glass ionomer class II restorations versus resin-based composites in primary molars: a randomized comparison trial.
    Kupietzky A; Atia Joachim D; Tal E; Moskovitz M
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2019 Oct; 20(5):451-456. PubMed ID: 30820833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Giomer composite compared to glass ionomer in occlusoproximal ART restorations of primary molars: 24-month RCT.
    Pássaro AL; Olegário IC; Laux CM; Oliveira RC; Tedesco TK; Raggio DP
    Aust Dent J; 2022 Jun; 67(2):148-158. PubMed ID: 34904247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-year clinical evaluation of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in non-carious cervical lesions: a randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial.
    Celik EU; Tunac AT; Yilmaz F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1473-1480. PubMed ID: 30120605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature.
    Chadwick BL; Evans DJ
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2007 Mar; 8(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 17394886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-year performance of a nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class II primary molar restorations.
    Dermata A; Papageorgiou SN; Kotsanos N
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2021 Jun; 22(3):425-432. PubMed ID: 33201411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars.
    Folkesson UH; Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW
    Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10371000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Performance of Non-Carious Cervical Restorations Restored with the "Sandwich Technique" and Composite Resin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Paula AM; Boing TF; Wambier LM; Hanzen TA; Loguercio AD; Armas-Vega A; Reis A
    J Adhes Dent; 2019; 21(6):497-508. PubMed ID: 31802065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.