315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30361827)
1. Insurance status does not affect short-term outcomes after oncological colorectal surgery in Europe, but influences the use of minimally invasive techniques: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Schneider MA; Rickenbacher A; Frick L; Cabalzar-Wondberg D; Käser S; Clavien PA; Turina M
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Nov; 403(7):863-872. PubMed ID: 30361827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Match Analysis.
de'Angelis N; Abdalla S; Bianchi G; Memeo R; Charpy C; Petrucciani N; Sobhani I; Brunetti F
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Nov; 28(11):1334-1345. PubMed ID: 29851362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Keller DS; Delaney CP; Hashemi L; Haas EM
Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4220-8. PubMed ID: 26715021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice.
Hassan I; You YN; Cima RR; Larson DW; Dozois EJ; Barnes SA; Pemberton JH
Surg Endosc; 2008 Mar; 22(3):739-43. PubMed ID: 17704883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The oncological and surgical safety of robot-assisted surgery in colorectal cancer: outcomes of a longitudinal prospective cohort study.
Polat F; Willems LH; Dogan K; Rosman C
Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3644-3655. PubMed ID: 30693389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of minimally invasive and open colorectal resections for patients undergoing simultaneous R0 resection for liver metastases: a propensity score analysis.
Lin Q; Ye Q; Zhu D; Wei Y; Ren L; Zheng P; Xu P; Ye L; Lv M; Fan J; Xu J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Mar; 30(3):385-95. PubMed ID: 25503803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examination of Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Minimally Invasive Surgery Among a National Cohort of Adult Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.
Damle RN; Flahive JM; Davids JS; Maykel JA; Sturrock PR; Alavi K
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 27749481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive liver resection for colorectal metastases: A case-control study of 130 patients.
Karagkounis G; Akyuz M; Guerron AD; Yazici P; Aucejo FN; Quintini C; Miller CM; Vogt DP; Fung JJ; Berber E
Surgery; 2016 Oct; 160(4):1097-1103. PubMed ID: 27486002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of preoperative opioid use on outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: A propensity-matched comparison study.
Cortez AR; Freeman CM; Levinsky NC; Kassam AF; Wima K; Jung AD; Rafferty JF; Paquette IM
Surgery; 2019 Oct; 166(4):632-638. PubMed ID: 31472973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.
Iversen LH
Dan Med J; 2012 Apr; 59(4):B4428. PubMed ID: 22459726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of antithrombotic agents on short-term outcomes following minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Sueda T; Tei M; Nishida K; Nomura M; Yoshikawa Y; Matsumura T; Koga C; Miyagaki H; Tsujie M; Akamaru Y
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 May; 37(5):1049-1062. PubMed ID: 35411471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery?
Ackerman SJ; Daniel S; Baik R; Liu E; Mehendale S; Tackett S; Hellan M
J Med Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 29065737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy at the time of surgery is not associated with increased 30-day morbidity and mortality following colorectal resection.
Bartlett EK; Choudhury RA; Roses RE; Fraker DL; Kelz RR; Karakousis GC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 May; 22(5):1664-72. PubMed ID: 25124471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of Local Excision for Rectal Neoplasms Using Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Multi-institutional Matched Analysis.
Lee L; Edwards K; Hunter IA; Hartley JE; Atallah SB; Albert MR; Hill J; Monson JR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Sep; 60(9):928-935. PubMed ID: 28796731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing appropriateness for elective colorectal cancer surgery: clinical, oncological, and quality-of-life short-term outcomes employing different treatment approaches.
Bertani E; Chiappa A; Biffi R; Bianchi PP; Radice D; Branchi V; Cenderelli E; Vetrano I; Cenciarelli S; Andreoni B
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2011 Oct; 26(10):1317-27. PubMed ID: 21750927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness analysis of gum chewing in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Pattamatta M; Smeets BJJ; Evers SMAA; Rutten HJT; Luyer MDP; Hiligsmann M
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Oct; 118(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 29378476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
