These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30362027)

  • 21. The benefits of testing for learning on later performance.
    McConnell MM; St-Onge C; Young ME
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 May; 20(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 24973998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantitative analysis of single best answer multiple choice questions in pharmaceutics.
    Al Muhaissen SA; Ratka A; Akour A; AlKhatib HS
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Mar; 11(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 30904146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How important is distractor efficiency for grading Best Answer Questions?
    Puthiaparampil T; Rahman M
    BMC Med Educ; 2021 Jan; 21(1):29. PubMed ID: 33413332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A psychometric analysis of a newly developed summative, multiple choice question assessment adapted from Canada to a Middle Eastern context.
    Pawluk SA; Shah K; Minhas R; Rainkie D; Wilby KJ
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Aug; 10(8):1026-1032. PubMed ID: 30314537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions by Item Analysis, from an Online Internal Assessment of 6
    Bhattacherjee S; Mukherjee A; Bhandari K; Rout AJ
    Indian J Community Med; 2022; 47(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 35368481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Position of Correct Option and Distractors Impacts Responses to Multiple-Choice Items: Evidence From a National Test.
    Lions S; Dartnell P; Toledo G; Godoy MI; Córdova N; Jiménez D; Lemarié J
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Oct; 83(5):861-884. PubMed ID: 37663536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Item and Test Analysis to Identify Quality Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) from an Assessment of Medical Students of Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
    Gajjar S; Sharma R; Kumar P; Rana M
    Indian J Community Med; 2014 Jan; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 24696535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Item analysis and optimizing multiple-choice questions for a viable question bank in ophthalmology: A cross-sectional study.
    Bhat SK; Prasad KHL
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 69(2):343-346. PubMed ID: 33463588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Decreasing the options' number in multiple choice questions in the assessment of senior medical students and its effect on exam psychometrics and distractors' function.
    Al-Lawama M; Kumwenda B
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Apr; 23(1):212. PubMed ID: 37016397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.
    Schneid SD; Armour C; Park YS; Yudkowsky R; Bordage G
    Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 48(10):1020-7. PubMed ID: 25200022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tips for developing a valid and reliable bank of multiple choice questions (MCQs).
    Sadaf S; Khan S; Ali SK
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2012; 25(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 23823639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving multiple-choice questions to better assess dental student knowledge: distractor utilization in oral and maxillofacial pathology course examinations.
    McMahan CA; Pinckard RN; Prihoda TJ; Hendricson WD; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2013 Dec; 77(12):1593-609. PubMed ID: 24319131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
    Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality of multiple-choice questions in medical internship qualification examination determined by item response theory at Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.
    Belay LM; Sendekie TY; Eyowas FA
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 Aug; 22(1):635. PubMed ID: 35989323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Item statistics derived from three-option versions of multiple-choice questions are usually as robust as four- or five-option versions: implications for exam design.
    Loudon C; Macias-Muñoz A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2018 Dec; 42(4):565-575. PubMed ID: 30192185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Impact of 3-Option Responses to Multiple-Choice Questions on Guessing Strategies and Cut Score Determinations.
    Royal KD; Stockdale MR
    J Adv Med Educ Prof; 2017 Apr; 5(2):84-89. PubMed ID: 28367465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of one-best MCQs: the difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency.
    Hingorjo MR; Jaleel F
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22755376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
    Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of long-menu and single-best-answer multiple choice questions in computer-based summative assessments: a randomised controlled trial.
    Cerutti B; Stollar F; Escher M; Blondon K; Aujesky S; Nendaz M; Galetto-Lacour A
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):219. PubMed ID: 31215430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.