These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30362027)

  • 41. Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool.
    Kumar D; Jaipurkar R; Shekhar A; Sikri G; Srinivas V
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2021 Feb; 77(Suppl 1):S85-S89. PubMed ID: 33612937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Multiple-choice testing in anatomy.
    Nnodim JO
    Med Educ; 1992 Jul; 26(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 1630332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
    Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An Enhancement-focused framework for developing high quality single best answer multiple choice questions.
    AlMahmoud T; Elzubeir MA; Shaban S; Branicki F
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 26996644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reliability of a 25-item low-stakes multiple-choice assessment of bronchoscopic knowledge.
    Quadrelli S; Davoudi M; Galíndez F; Colt HG
    Chest; 2009 Feb; 135(2):315-321. PubMed ID: 18849404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of 3- and 4-option multiple-choice items for medical subspecialty in-training examinations.
    Chen D; Harman AE; Sun H; Ye T; Gaiser RR
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Apr; 23(1):286. PubMed ID: 37106417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A, B, or C? A Quasi-experimental Multi-site Study Investigating Three Option Multiple Choice Questions.
    Hartigan-Rogers JA; Redmond S; Cobbett S; Cifuentes K; Honan D; Richard E; Sheane V; VanTassell T
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2019 Dec; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 31863697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison in the quality of distractors in three and four options type of multiple choice questions.
    Rahma NAA; Shamad MMA; Idris MEA; Elfaki OA; Elfakey WEM; Salih KMA
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2017; 8():287-291. PubMed ID: 28442942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Are Multiple Choice Questions for Post Graduate Dental Entrance Examinations Spot On?-Item Analysis of MCQs in Prosthodontics in India.
    Shigli K; Nayak SS; Gali S; Sankeshwari B; Fulari D; Shyam Kishore K; Upadhya P N; Jirge V
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2018 Oct; 110(5):455-458. PubMed ID: 30129514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Distractors with information in multiple choice items: a rationale based on the Rasch model.
    Andrich D; Styles I
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 21512214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Is the formal quality of multiple choice questions used for continuing medical education influenced by guidelines for authors provided by the publishing houses?].
    Drossard S; Bauer D; Fischer M; Kühne-Eversmann L
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Apr; 121():29-35. PubMed ID: 28416209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.
    Al Ameer AY
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50441. PubMed ID: 38222171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Natural-Language-Processing-Based Procedure for Generating Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions.
    Baldwin P; Mee J; Yaneva V; Paniagua M; D'Angelo J; Swygert K; Clauser BE
    Eval Health Prof; 2022 Dec; 45(4):327-340. PubMed ID: 34753326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Item Analysis of Single Best Response Type Multiple Choice Questions for Formative Assessment in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
    Kulshreshtha S; Gupta G; Goyal G; Gupta K; Davda K
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2024 Jun; 74(3):256-264. PubMed ID: 38974743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
    Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Item analysis of in use multiple choice questions in pharmacology.
    Kaur M; Singla S; Mahajan R
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2016; 6(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 27563581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Construction of Multiple Choice Questions Before and After An Educational Intervention.
    Tenzin K; Dorji T; Tenzin T
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2017; 56(205):112-116. PubMed ID: 28598446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of medical students in radiology. Written testing using uncued multiple-choice questions.
    Fajardo LL; Chan KM
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Oct; 28(10):964-8. PubMed ID: 8262753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fixed or mixed: a comparison of three, four and mixed-option multiple-choice tests in a Fetal Surveillance Education Program.
    Zoanetti N; Beaves M; Griffin P; Wallace EM
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Mar; 13():35. PubMed ID: 23453056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.