246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30362405)
1. Spatial biases in deaf, blind, and deafblind individuals as revealed by a haptic line bisection task.
Cattaneo Z; Rinaldi L; Geraci C; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2325-2333. PubMed ID: 30362405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory deprivation affects biases of visuospatial attention as measured by line bisection.
Cattaneo Z; Lega C; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
Exp Brain Res; 2014 Sep; 232(9):2767-73. PubMed ID: 24770861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deaf Individuals Show a Leftward Bias in Numerical Bisection.
Cattaneo Z; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):156-64. PubMed ID: 26562852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Role of Binocular Vision in Driving Pseudoneglect in Visual and Haptic Bisection: Evidence From Strabismic and Monocular Blind Individuals.
Ciricugno A; Rinaldi L; Vecchi T; Merabet LB; Cattaneo Z
Multisens Res; 2020 Mar; 33(4-5):549-567. PubMed ID: 31059488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial biases in peripersonal space in sighted and blind individuals revealed by a haptic line bisection paradigm.
Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Tinti C; Pascual-Leone A; Silvanto J; Vecchi T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1110-21. PubMed ID: 21517214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crossmodal interaction between the mental number line and peripersonal haptic space representation in sighted and blind individuals.
Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Tinti C; Silvanto J; Vecchi T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):885-90. PubMed ID: 20436186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial imagery relies on a sensory independent, though sensory sensitive, functional organization within the parietal cortex: a fMRI study of angle discrimination in sighted and congenitally blind individuals.
Bonino D; Ricciardi E; Bernardi G; Sani L; Gentili C; Vecchi T; Pietrini P
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():59-70. PubMed ID: 25575449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Listening to white noise counteracts visual and haptic pseudoneglect.
Cattaneo Z; Lega C; Vecchi T; Vallar G
Perception; 2012; 41(11):1395-8. PubMed ID: 23513624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Listening to numbers affects visual and haptic bisection in healthy individuals and neglect patients.
Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Mancini F; Mattioli F; Vallar G
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):913-25. PubMed ID: 22326591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deaf, blind or deaf-blind: Is touch enhanced?
Papagno C; Cecchetto C; Pisoni A; Bolognini N
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):627-36. PubMed ID: 26573575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Related but different: Examining pseudoneglect in audition, touch and vision.
Eardley AF; Darling S; Dumper P; Browne D; Van Velzen J
Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():164-171. PubMed ID: 28242465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Haptic spatial configuration learning in deaf and hearing individuals.
van Dijk R; Kappers AM; Postma A
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61336. PubMed ID: 23593465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of attention and laterality on motion and orientation discrimination in deaf signers.
Bosworth RG; Petrich JA; Dobkins KR
Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 23455437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blind individuals show pseudoneglect in bisecting numerical intervals.
Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Silvanto J; Tinti C; Vecchi T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1021-8. PubMed ID: 21287314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
Brooks JL; Darling S; Malvaso C; Della Sala S
Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.
Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 12027401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.
Cattani A; Clibbens J; Perfect TJ
Neuropsychology; 2007 Jan; 21(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 17201534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
