162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30364882)
1. In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel, Minimally Invasive, Sacroiliac Joint Fixation Device.
Cross WW; Berven SH; Slater N; Lehrman JN; Newcomb AGUS; Kelly BP
Int J Spine Surg; 2018 Oct; 12(5):587-594. PubMed ID: 30364882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical effects of a novel posteriorly placed sacroiliac joint fusion device integrated with traditional lumbopelvic long-construct instrumentation.
de Andrada Pereira B; Lehrman JN; Sawa AGU; Lindsey DP; Yerby SA; Godzik J; Waguespack AM; Uribe JS; Kelly BP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jun; 35(3):320-329. PubMed ID: 34144523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of implant placement on sacroiliac joint range of motion: posterior versus transarticular.
Soriano-Baron H; Lindsey DP; Rodriguez-Martinez N; Reyes PM; Newcomb A; Yerby SA; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(9):E525-30. PubMed ID: 25705956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.
Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical investigation of a novel integrated device for intra-articular stabilization of the C1-C2 (atlantoaxial) joint.
Robertson PA; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 22341395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.
Schmoelz W; Onder U; Martin A; von Strempel A
Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1478-85. PubMed ID: 19504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanics of unilateral and bilateral sacroiliac joint stabilization: laboratory investigation.
Lindsey DP; Parrish R; Gundanna M; Leasure J; Yerby SA; Kondrashov D
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):326-332. PubMed ID: 29303472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw fixation on cadaveric model simulated two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion].
Dong JW; Feng F; Zhao WD; Rong LM; Liu XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 49(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 21733402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a minimally invasive procedure for sacroiliac joint fusion - an in vitro biomechanical analysis of initial and cycled properties.
Lindsey DP; Perez-Orribo L; Rodriguez-Martinez N; Reyes PM; Newcomb A; Cable A; Hickam G; Yerby SA; Crawford NR
Med Devices (Auckl); 2014; 7():131-7. PubMed ID: 24868175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanics of transvertebral screw fixation in the thoracic spine: an in vitro study.
Rodriguez-Martinez NG; Savardekar A; Nottmeier EW; Pirris S; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Mendes GA; Kalb S; Theodore N; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 27035506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biomechanical comparison of crossed and parallel rod configurations in atlantoaxial internal fixation.
Qiu F; Zou XB; Xu XL; Jiang WC; Liu GC; Ma XY
Eur Spine J; 2021 Feb; 30(2):576-584. PubMed ID: 33180193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical Effects of Lateral Inclination C
Zhang L; Wang H
Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2027-2033. PubMed ID: 34541829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel motion preservation device for atlantoaxial instability.
Kato K; Yokoyama T; Ono A; Numasawa T; Wada K; Tonosaki Y; Osato Y; Sasagawa K; Toh S
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 May; 26(3):E107-11. PubMed ID: 22960418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of Goel technique for C1-2 fusion.
Park J; Scheer JK; Lim TJ; Deviren V; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 21332283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of motion following sacroiliac joint fusion using lateral sacroiliac screws with or without lumbosacral instrumented fusion.
Dall BE; Eden SV; Cho W; Karkenny A; Brooks DM; Hayward GM; Moldavsky M; Yandamuri S; Bucklen BS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Aug; 68():182-189. PubMed ID: 31234032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of a posterior non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
Schmoelz W; Erhart S; Unger S; Disch AC
Eur Spine J; 2012 May; 21(5):939-45. PubMed ID: 22205112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
