163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30364882)
21. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical evaluation of diagonal fixation in pedicle screw instrumentation.
Lim TH; Kim JG; Fujiwara A; Yoon TT; Lee SC; Ha JW; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Nov; 26(22):2498-503. PubMed ID: 11707718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.
Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study.
Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R
Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Cadaver-Based Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Posterior Approach to Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Analysis of the Fixation and Center of the Instantaneous Axis of Rotation.
Sayed D; Amirdelfan K; Naidu RK; Raji OR; Falowski S
Med Devices (Auckl); 2021; 14():435-444. PubMed ID: 34949942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The optimal insertion position of the lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (Coflex): a biomechanical evaluation].
Zu D; Hai Y; Lu S; Yang J; Liu Y; Liu T; Meng X; Zhou L; Pang C
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 52(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 24785455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Novel pedicle screw and plate system provides superior stability in unilateral fixation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Li J; Xiao H; Zhu Q; Zhou Y; Li C; Liu H; Huang Z; Shang J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0123134. PubMed ID: 25807513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis of Contralateral Sacroiliac Joint Motion Following Unilateral Sacroiliac Stabilization with and without Lumbosacral Fixation.
Cho W; Wang W; Lim HJ; Bucklen BS
Asian Spine J; 2023 Feb; 17(1):185-193. PubMed ID: 36849242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical Analysis of an Interspinous Process Fixation Device with In Situ Shortening Capabilities: Does Spinous Process Compression Improve Segmental Stability?
Wagener C; Gandhi A; Ferry C; Farmer S; DenHaese R
World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e483-e494. PubMed ID: 32891838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical testing of different posterior fusion devices on lumbar spinal range of motion.
Hartmann F; Nusselt T; Maier G; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Feb; 62():121-126. PubMed ID: 30738222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Stand Alone Versus Facet Screw and Pedicle Screw Augmented Lateral Interbody Arthrodesis: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model.
Kretzer RM; Molina C; Hu N; Umekoji H; Baaj AA; Serhan H; Cunningham BW
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):E336-43. PubMed ID: 27137151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical evaluation of sacroiliac joint fixation with decortication.
Shih YC; Beaubien BP; Chen Q; Sembrano JN
Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1241-1249. PubMed ID: 29481980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Primary stiffness of a modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with integrated screw fixation: cadaveric biomechanical study.
Keiler A; Schmoelz W; Erhart S; Gnanalingham K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug; 39(17):E994-E1000. PubMed ID: 24875958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical Comparison of C1 Lateral Mass-C2 Short Pedicle Screw-C3 Lateral Mass Screw-Rod Construct Versus Goel-Harms Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability.
Lu Y; Lee YP; Bhatia NN; Lee TQ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):E393-E399. PubMed ID: 30234804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical evaluation of a simulated T-9 burst fracture of the thoracic spine with an intact rib cage.
Perry TG; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; Francis T; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 24949903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
