These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30365240)

  • 1. Landmark Typology in Applied Morphometrics Studies: What's the Point?
    Wärmländer SKTS; Garvin H; Guyomarc'h P; Petaros A; Sholts SB
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2019 Jul; 302(7):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 30365240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Resolution and Texture of Laser Scanning Generated Three-Dimensional Models on Landmark Identification.
    Toneva D; Nikolova S; Georgiev I; Lazarov N
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2020 Jul; 303(7):1950-1965. PubMed ID: 31577844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-Density Morphometric Analysis of Shape and Integration: The Good, the Bad, and the Not-Really-a-Problem.
    Goswami A; Watanabe A; Felice RN; Bardua C; Fabre AC; Polly PD
    Integr Comp Biol; 2019 Sep; 59(3):669-683. PubMed ID: 31243431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Kwon MS; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):563-568. PubMed ID: 26683131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.
    Percival CJ; Devine J; Darwin BC; Liu W; van Eede M; Henkelman RM; Hallgrimsson B
    J Anat; 2019 Jun; 234(6):917-935. PubMed ID: 30901082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reality of virtual anthropology: Comparing digitizer and laser scan data collection methods for the quantitative assessment of the cranium.
    Algee-Hewitt BF; Wheat AD
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2016 May; 160(1):148-55. PubMed ID: 26714825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing repeatability and error of coordinate landmark data acquired from crania.
    Ross AH; Williams S
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):782-5. PubMed ID: 18537868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing Methods to Assess Intraobserver Measurement Error of 3D Craniofacial Landmarks Using Geometric Morphometrics Through a Digitizer Arm.
    Menéndez LP
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):741-746. PubMed ID: 27874192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Schlicher W; Nielsen I; Huang JC; Maki K; Hatcher DC; Miller AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 21385857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
    Chien PC; Parks ET; Eraso F; Hartsfield JK; Roberts WE; Ofner S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jul; 38(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 19474253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes.
    Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 29016738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining the Variations in the Results of the Hotelling T (2) Test in Case of Changing Baseline Landmarks in the Bookstein Coordinates.
    Ercan I; Sigirli D; Ozkaya G
    Interdiscip Sci; 2015 Jun; 7(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 26199212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement error using a SeeMaLab structured light 3D scanner against a Microscribe 3D digitizer.
    Messer D; Svendsen MS; Galatius A; Olsen MT; Dahl VA; Conradsen K; Dahl AB
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11804. PubMed ID: 34484981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Principles and methods of geometric morphometrics].
    Pavlinov IIa; Mikeshina NG
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2002; 63(6):473-93. PubMed ID: 12510587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing semi-landmarking approaches for analyzing three-dimensional cranial morphology.
    Rolfe S; Davis C; Maga AM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2021 May; 175(1):227-237. PubMed ID: 33483951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A standardized nomenclature for craniofacial and facial anthropometry.
    Caple J; Stephan CN
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):863-79. PubMed ID: 26662189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "What and how should we share?" An inter-method inter-observer comparison of measurement error with landmark-based craniometric datasets.
    Bertsatos A; Gkaniatsou E; Papageorgopoulou C; Chovalopoulou ME
    Anthropol Anz; 2020 Apr; 77(2):109-120. PubMed ID: 31851205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional cephalometry: a method for the identification and for the orientation of the skull after cone-bean computed tomographic scan.
    Frongia G; Bracco P; Piancino MG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e308-11. PubMed ID: 23715002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.