These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30365248)

  • 1. A modified Steiner's analysis that does not require radiographic exposure of the cranial base.
    Finn SC; Silver MT; Canary B; Kantarci A; Allareddy V; Katebi N; Masoud MI
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 Feb; 22(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 30365248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Steiner's cephalometric norms for the Nepalese population.
    Sharma JN
    J Orthod; 2011 Mar; 38(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 21367825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between 3D dentofacial photogrammetry measurements and traditional cephalometric measurements.
    Castillo JC; Gianneschi G; Azer D; Manosudprasit A; Haghi A; Bansal N; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):275-283. PubMed ID: 30779676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Skeletal variations in children with Class II division 1 malocclusion].
    Rusić-Tasić V
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1990; 23(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 2206405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal jaw base relationship prior to orthognathic surgery: the role of anterior cranial base inclination.
    Jünger TH; Ruf S; Eisfeld J; Howaldt HP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 11307186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Evaluation of Nemoceph and Foxit PDF Reader for Steiner's Cephalometric Analysis.
    Kumar M; Kumari S; Shetty P; Kumar RR; Singh DP; Shetty P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Sep; 20(9):1051-1055. PubMed ID: 31797828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric Norms for Mewari Children using Steiner's Analysis.
    Singh Rathore A; Dhar V; Arora R; Diwanji A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012 Sep; 5(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 25206163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A comparative evaluation of Steiner's and McNamara's methods for determining the position of the bone bases].
    Oria A; Schellino E; Massaglia M; Fornengo B
    Minerva Stomatol; 1991 Jun; 40(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 1944052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of sonically derived and traditional cephalometric values.
    Hall DL; Bollen AM
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 9347110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Steiner's cephalometric analysis and treatment study].
    Iannetti G; Martucci E; Silvestri A; Cascone P
    Minerva Stomatol; 1981; 30(3):151-68. PubMed ID: 6943411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Steiner's norms for North Indian pre-school children.
    Anuradha ; Taneja JR; Chopra SL; Gupta A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1991 Mar; 8(1):36-7. PubMed ID: 2056345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of cranial base measurements on lateral skull radiographs.
    Arponen H; Elf H; Evälahti M; Waltimo-Sirén J
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):201-10. PubMed ID: 18950316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Variations of sagittal skeletal relationships in cases with normal occlusion].
    Glisić B; Jaksić N
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1990; 23(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 2096840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cephalometric norms of Saraswats based on Steiner's analysis.
    Padukone MP; Shaikh HS
    J Indian Orthod Soc; 1978; 10(1-2):7-16. PubMed ID: 296286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability of the cranial and dental phenotype in Williams syndrome.
    Axelsson S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (170):3-67. PubMed ID: 15762376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis.
    Lundström F; Lundström A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Mar; 101(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 1539551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molar bite force in relation to occlusion, craniofacial dimensions, and head posture in pre-orthodontic children.
    Sonnesen L; Bakke M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 15743864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of three-dimensional posterior cranial base angles using low-dose computed tomography.
    Olszewski R; Frison L; Schoenarts N; Khonsari RH; Odri GA; Zech F; Reychler H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2407-2414. PubMed ID: 28004246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.