203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30366822)
1. Cost Analysis of Dual-Mobility Versus Large Femoral Head Constructs in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Abdel MP; Miller LE; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Feb; 34(2):260-264. PubMed ID: 30366822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost Analysis of Dual-Mobility Constructs in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A European Payer Perspective.
Abdel MP; Miller LE; Hull SA; Coppolecchia AB; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
Orthopedics; 2020 Jul; 43(4):250-255. PubMed ID: 32674176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Cost-Effectiveness of Dual Mobility Implants for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Computer-Based Cost-Utility Model.
Barlow BT; McLawhorn AS; Westrich GH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(9):768-777. PubMed ID: 28463921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
Hartzler MA; Abdel MP; Sculco PK; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 29529658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of dual-mobility components in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures.
Montgomery S; Bourget-Murray J; You DZ; Nherera L; Khoshbin A; Atrey A; Powell JN
Bone Joint J; 2021 Dec; 103-B(12):1783-1790. PubMed ID: 34847713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conversion of Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Total Hip Arthroplasty Utilizing a Dual-Mobility Construct Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
Chalmers BP; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3071-3075. PubMed ID: 28579448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-Mobility Constructs in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.
Reina N; Pareek A; Krych AJ; Pagnano MW; Berry DJ; Abdel MP
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Mar; 34(3):594-603. PubMed ID: 30554926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Pituckanotai K; Arirachakaran A; Tuchinda H; Putananon C; Nualsalee N; Setrkraising K; Kongtharvonskul J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):445-455. PubMed ID: 29119371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No Difference in Dislocation Rates Comparing Large Diameter Jumbo Femoral Heads and Dual-Mobility Bearings in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Sonn KA; Deckard ER; Meneghini RM
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Nov; 36(11):3716-3721. PubMed ID: 34391597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utilizing Dual Mobility Components for First-Time Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Instability.
Lange JK; Spiro SK; Westrich GH
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):505-509. PubMed ID: 29079169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness model comparing dual-mobility to fixed-bearing designs for total hip replacement in France.
Epinette JA; Lafuma A; Robert J; Doz M
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 102(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 26803224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cost-effectiveness of dual mobility in a spinal deformity population with high risk of dislocation: a computer-based model.
Elbuluk AM; Slover J; Anoushiravani AA; Schwarzkopf R; Eftekhary N; Vigdorchik JM
Bone Joint J; 2018 Oct; 100-B(10):1297-1302. PubMed ID: 30295522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparison of Revision Rates for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Between Dual Mobility and Large Femoral Head Bearings in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subanalysis by Acetabular Component Size: An Analysis of 106,163 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
Hoskins W; Bingham R; Dyer C; Rainbird S; Graves SE
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Sep; 36(9):3233-3240. PubMed ID: 34088570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-Mobility Constructs in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.
Abdel MP
J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1328-1330. PubMed ID: 29500088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Instability After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Dual Mobility Versus Jumbo Femoral Heads.
Beckert M; Meneghini RM; Meding JB
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S571-S576. PubMed ID: 35271976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners?
Cafri G; Paxton EW; Love R; Bini SA; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May; 475(5):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 27385222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cementation of a Dual Mobility Construct in Recurrently Dislocating and High Risk Patients Undergoing Revision Total Arthroplasty.
Chalmers BP; Ledford CK; Taunton MJ; Sierra RJ; Lewallen DG; Trousdale RT
J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1501-1506. PubMed ID: 29273288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High Rate of Early Intraprosthetic Dislocations of Dual Mobility Implants: A Single Surgeon Series of Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacements.
Addona JL; Gu A; De Martino I; Malahias MA; Sculco TP; Sculco PK
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2793-2798. PubMed ID: 31402075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA.
Bozic KJ; Kamath AF; Ong K; Lau E; Kurtz S; Chan V; Vail TP; Rubash H; Berry DJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2131-8. PubMed ID: 25467789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual Mobility Articulation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An American Joint Replacement Registry Analysis of Patients Aged 65 Years and Older.
Otero JE; Heckmann ND; Jaffri H; Mullen KJ; Odum SM; Lieberman JR; Springer BD
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7 Suppl 2):S376-S380. PubMed ID: 37230227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
