227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30366880)
21. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.
Shapiro EY; Scarberry K; Patel T; Bergman A; Ahn JJ; Sahi N; RoyChoudhury A; Deutch I; McKiernan JM; Benson MC; Badani KK
J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins.
Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK
Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radical prostatectomy in Denmark: Survival analysis and temporal trends in clinicopathological parameters with up to 20 years of follow-up.
Heering M; Berg KD; Brasso K; Iversen P; Røder MA
Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 26(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 28317581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cancer-specific and other-cause mortality after radical prostatectomy versus observation in patients with prostate cancer: competing-risks analysis of a large North American population-based cohort.
Abdollah F; Sun M; Schmitges J; Tian Z; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Shariat SF; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2011 Nov; 60(5):920-30. PubMed ID: 21741762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Trend of Adverse Stage Migration in Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Preisser F; Marchioni M; Nazzani S; Bandini M; Tian Z; Saad F; Pompe RS; Briganti A; Budäus L; Montorsi F; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):160-168. PubMed ID: 31100241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The impact of prior TURP on radical prostatectomy surgical margins: a multicenter analysis.
Gacci M; Simonato A; Lanciotti M; Ennas M; Varca V; Maffezzini M; Imbimbo C; Gontero P; Schiavina R; Carini M; Martorana G; Nicita G; Mirone V; Carmignani G
Urol Int; 2013; 91(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23735440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Presence of biopsy Gleason pattern 5 + 3 is associated with higher mortality after radical prostatectomy but not after external beam radiotherapy compared to other Gleason Grade Group IV patterns.
Würnschimmel C; Wenzel M; Chierigo F; Flammia RS; Mori K; Tian Z; Shariat SF; Saad F; Briganti A; Suardi N; Terrone C; Gallucci M; Chun FKH; Tilki D; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Prostate; 2021 Aug; 81(11):778-784. PubMed ID: 34057220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Focal Laser Ablation Versus Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Survival Outcomes From a Matched Cohort.
Zheng X; Jin K; Qiu S; Han X; Liao X; Yang L; Wei Q
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Dec; 17(6):464-469.e3. PubMed ID: 31594734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database.
Vesey SG; McCabe JE; Hounsome L; Fowler S
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 21771246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of age at diagnosis on prostate cancer mortality: a grade-for-grade and stage-for-stage analysis.
Gandaglia G; Karakiewicz PI; Abdollah F; Becker A; Roghmann F; Sammon JD; Kim SP; Perrotte P; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Trinh QD; Sun M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1706-15. PubMed ID: 24915856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker?
Saether T; Sørlien LT; Viset T; Lydersen S; Angelsen A
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 18752153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Very long-term survival patterns of young patients treated with radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
Dell'Oglio P; Karnes RJ; Joniau S; Spahn M; Gontero P; Tosco L; Fossati N; Kneitz B; Chlosta P; Graefen M; Marchioro G; Bianchi M; Sanchez-Salas R; Karakiewicz PI; Poppel HV; Montorsi F; Briganti A;
Urol Oncol; 2016 May; 34(5):234.e13-9. PubMed ID: 26706120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
