BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30367380)

  • 21. Determinants of the response of left ventricular ejection fraction to vasodilator stress in electrocardiographically gated (82)rubidium myocardial perfusion PET.
    Brown TL; Merrill J; Volokh L; Bengel FM
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Feb; 35(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 17912523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of rubidium-82 myocardial blood flow quantification with coronary calcium score for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis.
    Meintjes M; Sathekge M; Makanjee CR; Dickson JC; Endozo R; Rheeder P; Bomanji J
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Feb; 37(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 26485453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF.
    Dorbala S; Hachamovitch R; Curillova Z; Thomas D; Vangala D; Kwong RY; Di Carli MF
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jul; 2(7):846-54. PubMed ID: 19608135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Myocardial blood flow assessment with 82rubidium-PET imaging in patients with left bundle branch block.
    Falcão A; Chalela W; Giorgi MC; Imada R; Soares J; Do Val R; Oliveira MA; Izaki M; Kalil Filho RK; Meneghetti JC
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2015 Nov; 70(11):726-32. PubMed ID: 26602518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prognostic value of vasodilator response using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Arasaratnam P; Sadreddini M; Yam Y; Kansal V; Dorbala S; Di Carli MF; Beanlands RS; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veledar E; Min JK; Chen L; Ruddy TD; Germano G; Berman DS; Shaw LJ; Chow BJW
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Apr; 45(4):538-548. PubMed ID: 29177706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of myocardial blood flow induced by adenosine triphosphate and dipyridamole in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Mamede M; Tadamura E; Hosokawa R; Ohba M; Kubo S; Yamamuro M; Kimura T; Kita T; Saga T; Togashi K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Dec; 19(8):711-7. PubMed ID: 16444998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT.
    Ho KT; Chua KC; Klotz E; Panknin C
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Aug; 3(8):811-20. PubMed ID: 20705260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel on Myocardial Perfusion in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
    Pelletier-Galarneau M; Hunter CRRN; Ascah KJ; Beanlands RSB; Dwivedi G; deKemp RA; Chow BJW; Ruddy TD
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 May; 6(5):. PubMed ID: 28465300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative relationship between coronary artery calcium and myocardial blood flow by hybrid rubidium-82 PET/CT imaging in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Assante R; Zampella E; Arumugam P; Acampa W; Imbriaco M; Tout D; Petretta M; Tonge C; Cuocolo A
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 24(2):494-501. PubMed ID: 26780529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Mapping by CMR to Detect Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Validation Against Invasive Coronary Physiology.
    Kotecha T; Martinez-Naharro A; Boldrini M; Knight D; Hawkins P; Kalra S; Patel D; Coghlan G; Moon J; Plein S; Lockie T; Rakhit R; Patel N; Xue H; Kellman P; Fontana M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 12(10):1958-1969. PubMed ID: 30772231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic value of ischemia severity at myocardial perfusion imaging in elderly persons with suspected coronary disease.
    Canepa M; Bezante G; Vianello P; Ameri P; Milaneschi Y; Aste M; Cavalla F; Bauckneht M; Marini C; Balbi M; Brunelli C; Sambuceti G
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2016 Oct; 17(10):719-28. PubMed ID: 26599683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of Outflow Tract Contributions to 82Rb-PET Global Myocardial Blood Flow Computations.
    Van Tosh A; Reichek N; Palestro CJ; Nichols KJ
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2016 Jun; 44(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26966126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semi-quantitative myocardial perfusion measured by computed tomography in patients with refractory angina: a head-to-head comparison with quantitative rubidium-82 positron emission tomography as reference.
    Qayyum AA; Kühl JT; Kjaer A; Hasbak P; Kofoed KF; Kastrup J
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 Sep; 37(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 26625937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient correlates with invasive fractional flow reserve in CAD patients.
    Valenta I; Antoniou A; Marashdeh W; Leucker T; Kasper E; Jones SR; Dannals RF; Solnes L; Pomper MG; Schindler TH
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 18(5):538-548. PubMed ID: 27325812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb positron emission tomography: clinical validation with 15O-water.
    Prior JO; Allenbach G; Valenta I; Kosinski M; Burger C; Verdun FR; Bischof Delaloye A; Kaufmann PA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jun; 39(6):1037-47. PubMed ID: 22398957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of obstructive coronary artery disease using regadenoson stress and 82Rb PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Hsiao E; Ali B; Blankstein R; Skali H; Ali T; Bruyere J; Kwong RY; Di Carli MF; Dorbala S
    J Nucl Med; 2013 Oct; 54(10):1748-54. PubMed ID: 23940305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of unexpected factors on quantitative myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve in young, asymptomatic volunteers.
    Sdringola S; Johnson NP; Kirkeeide RL; Cid E; Gould KL
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Apr; 4(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 21492816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [
    Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Nijveldt R; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Integrated Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Diagnostics Improve Detection of Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis by 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography.
    Lee JM; Kim CH; Koo BK; Hwang D; Park J; Zhang J; Tong Y; Jeon KH; Bang JI; Suh M; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Na SH; Ahn JM; Park SJ; Kim HS
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 27609817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography With Selective PET Perfusion Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease.
    Maaniitty T; Stenström I; Bax JJ; Uusitalo V; Ukkonen H; Kajander S; Mäki M; Saraste A; Knuuti J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1361-1370. PubMed ID: 28528146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.