271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30367581)
1. A new estimation of protein-level false discovery rate.
Wu G; Wan X; Xu B
BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(Suppl 6):567. PubMed ID: 30367581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decoy-free protein-level false discovery rate estimation.
Teng B; Huang T; He Z
Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 30(5):675-81. PubMed ID: 23926225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. IPM: An integrated protein model for false discovery rate estimation and identification in high-throughput proteomics.
Higdon R; Reiter L; Hather G; Haynes W; Kolker N; Stewart E; Bauman AT; Picotti P; Schmidt A; van Belle G; Aebersold R; Kolker E
J Proteomics; 2011 Dec; 75(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 21718813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transfer posterior error probability estimation for peptide identification.
Yi X; Gong F; Fu Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 21(1):173. PubMed ID: 32366221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. False discovery rate and permutation test: an evaluation in ERP data analysis.
Lage-Castellanos A; Martínez-Montes E; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Galán L
Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19941298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Common Decoy Distributions Simplify False Discovery Rate Estimation in Shotgun Proteomics.
Madej D; Wu L; Lam H
J Proteome Res; 2022 Feb; 21(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 34989576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unbiased False Discovery Rate Estimation for Shotgun Proteomics Based on the Target-Decoy Approach.
Levitsky LI; Ivanov MV; Lobas AA; Gorshkov MV
J Proteome Res; 2017 Feb; 16(2):393-397. PubMed ID: 27959540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transferred subgroup false discovery rate for rare post-translational modifications detected by mass spectrometry.
Fu Y; Qian X
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2014 May; 13(5):1359-68. PubMed ID: 24200586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Costs and Benefits of Popular
Shuken SR; McNerney MW
Anal Chem; 2023 Feb; 95(5):2732-2740. PubMed ID: 36693222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. False Discovery Rate Estimation for Hybrid Mass Spectral Library Search Identifications in Bottom-up Proteomics.
Burke MC; Zhang Z; Mirokhin YA; Tchekovskoi DV; Liang Y; Stein SE
J Proteome Res; 2019 Sep; 18(9):3223-3234. PubMed ID: 31364354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling Lower-Order Statistics to Enable Decoy-Free FDR Estimation in Proteomics.
Madej D; Lam H
J Proteome Res; 2023 Apr; 22(4):1159-1171. PubMed ID: 36962508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semi-parametric differential expression analysis via partial mixture estimation.
Rossell D; Guerra R; Scott C
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article15. PubMed ID: 18454730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False discovery rates in spectral identification.
Jeong K; Kim S; Bandeira N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 16(Suppl 16):S2. PubMed ID: 23176207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple testing with discrete data: Proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures.
Chen X; Doerge RW; Heyse JF
Biom J; 2018 Jul; 60(4):761-779. PubMed ID: 29748972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics.
Wang G; Wu WW; Zhang Z; Masilamani S; Shen RF
Anal Chem; 2009 Jan; 81(1):146-59. PubMed ID: 19061407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to talk about protein-level false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics.
The M; Tasnim A; Käll L
Proteomics; 2016 Sep; 16(18):2461-9. PubMed ID: 27503675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis for protein identification: a case study on yeast data.
Higdon R; Haynes W; Kolker E
OMICS; 2010 Jun; 14(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 20569183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved False Discovery Rate Estimation Procedure for Shotgun Proteomics.
Keich U; Kertesz-Farkas A; Noble WS
J Proteome Res; 2015 Aug; 14(8):3148-61. PubMed ID: 26152888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ConReg-R: Extrapolative recalibration of the empirical distribution of p-values to improve false discovery rate estimates.
Li J; Paramita P; Choi KP; Karuturi RK
Biol Direct; 2011 May; 6():27. PubMed ID: 21595983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experiment-specific estimation of peptide identification probabilities using a randomized database.
Higdon R; Hogan JM; Kolker N; van Belle G; Kolker E
OMICS; 2007; 11(4):351-65. PubMed ID: 18092908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
