These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30368066)

  • 1. How metacontrol biases and adaptivity impact performance in cognitive search tasks.
    Mekern VN; Sjoerds Z; Hommel B
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():251-259. PubMed ID: 30368066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The social transmission of metacontrol policies: Mechanisms underlying the interpersonal transfer of persistence and flexibility.
    Hommel B; Colzato LS
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2017 Oct; 81(Pt A):43-58. PubMed ID: 28088534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissociating expectancy-based and experience-based control in task switching.
    Liu C; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Feb; 46(2):131-154. PubMed ID: 31985251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proactive and reactive metacontrol in task switching.
    Kang MS; Chiu YC
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1617-1632. PubMed ID: 34136973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metacontrol of human creativity: The neurocognitive mechanisms of convergent and divergent thinking.
    Zhang W; Sjoerds Z; Hommel B
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 210():116572. PubMed ID: 31972282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Role of DRD1 and DRD2 Receptors for Response Selection Under Varying Complexity Levels: Implications for Metacontrol Processes.
    Zink N; Bensmann W; Arning L; Colzato LS; Stock AK; Beste C
    Int J Neuropsychopharmacol; 2019 Dec; 22(12):747-753. PubMed ID: 31123756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resting-state BOLD signal variability is associated with individual differences in metacontrol.
    Zhang C; Beste C; Prochazkova L; Wang K; Speer SPH; Smidts A; Boksem MAS; Hommel B
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):18425. PubMed ID: 36319653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive flexibility: A distinct element of performance impairment due to sleep deprivation.
    Honn KA; Hinson JM; Whitney P; Van Dongen HPA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():191-197. PubMed ID: 29549968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacontrol and body ownership: divergent thinking increases the virtual hand illusion.
    Ma K; Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 2020 Feb; 84(1):120-127. PubMed ID: 29322244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.
    Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Dockree PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():264-277. PubMed ID: 28222381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Metacontrol Perspective on Neurocognitive Atypicality: From Unipolar to Bipolar Accounts.
    Colzato LS; Beste C; Zhang W; Hommel B
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():846607. PubMed ID: 35815021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling graded response congruency effects in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():160-8. PubMed ID: 25463557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metacognitive predictions and strategic adaptation to distractors.
    Siri JM; Touron DR
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2020 Sep; 27(5):787-805. PubMed ID: 31658871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response selection in dual task paradigms: observations from random generation tasks.
    Dirnberger G; Jahanshahi M
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 201(3):535-48. PubMed ID: 20232508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing reward prospect promotes cognitive flexibility: Direct evidence from voluntary task switching with double registration.
    Fröber K; Pfister R; Dreisbach G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Aug; 72(8):1926-1944. PubMed ID: 30501581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Need for cognition does not account for individual differences in metacontrol of decision making.
    Bolenz F; Profitt MF; Stechbarth F; Eppinger B; Strobel A
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8240. PubMed ID: 35581395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive flexibility in young children: General or task-specific capacity?
    Deák GO; Wiseheart M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Oct; 138():31-53. PubMed ID: 26026421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mental engagement during cognitive and psychomotor tasks: Effects of task type, processing demands, and practice.
    Pendleton DM; Sakalik ML; Moore ML; Tomporowski PD
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Nov; 109():124-131. PubMed ID: 27585951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of rule uncertainty on cognitive flexibility in a card-sorting paradigm.
    Lange F; Kip A; Klein T; Müller D; Seer C; Kopp B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():53-64. PubMed ID: 30015136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Striatal activation as a neural link between cognitive and perceptual flexibility.
    Sekutowicz M; Schmack K; Steimke R; Paschke L; Sterzer P; Walter H; Stelzel C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 141():393-398. PubMed ID: 27474521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.