These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30368127)
21. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances. Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes. Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits of beef cattle using 50K and imputed HD genotypes. Lu D; Akanno EC; Crowley JJ; Schenkel F; Li H; De Pauw M; Moore SS; Wang Z; Li C; Stothard P; Plastow G; Miller SP; Basarab JA J Anim Sci; 2016 Apr; 94(4):1342-53. PubMed ID: 27135994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population. Gao H; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G; Byskov K; Jensen J J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9051-9. PubMed ID: 26433419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Association of genomically enhanced and parent average breeding values with cow performance in Nordic dairy cattle. Bengtsson C; Stålhammar H; Strandberg E; Eriksson S; Fikse WF J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6383-6391. PubMed ID: 32359981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Gunia M; Saintilan R; Venot E; Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Phocas F J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3258-69. PubMed ID: 24948648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Genomic prediction using different estimation methodology, blending and cross-validation techniques for growth traits and visual scores in Hereford and Braford cattle. Campos GS; Reimann FA; Cardoso LL; Ferreira CER; Junqueira VS; Schmidt PI; Braccini Neto J; Yokoo MJI; Sollero BP; Boligon AA; Cardoso FF J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(7):2579-2595. PubMed ID: 29741705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AC; Verbyla K; Goddard ME Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Nov; 41(1):51. PubMed ID: 19930712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Genome-enabled prediction of reproductive traits in Nellore cattle using parametric models and machine learning methods. Alves AAC; Espigolan R; Bresolin T; Costa RM; Fernandes Júnior GA; Ventura RV; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG Anim Genet; 2021 Feb; 52(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 33191532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows. Ding X; Zhang Z; Li X; Wang S; Wu X; Sun D; Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Q J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5315-23. PubMed ID: 23746588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency. Bolormaa S; MacLeod IM; Khansefid M; Marett LC; Wales WJ; Miglior F; Baes CF; Schenkel FS; Connor EE; Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Stothard P; Herman E; Nieuwhof GJ; Goddard ME; Pryce JE Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Sep; 54(1):60. PubMed ID: 36068488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle. Uemoto Y; Osawa T; Saburi J Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):382-393. PubMed ID: 27515004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive ability of selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a moderately sized dairy cattle population. Weller JI; Glick G; Shirak A; Ezra E; Seroussi E; Shemesh M; Zeron Y; Ron M Animal; 2014 Feb; 8(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 24433958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model. Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Genomic predictions combining SNP markers and copy number variations in Nellore cattle. Hay EHA; Utsunomiya YT; Xu L; Zhou Y; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Bickhart DM; Ma L; Garcia JF; Liu GE BMC Genomics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):441. PubMed ID: 29871610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Changes in genomic predictions when new information is added. Hidalgo J; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Miller S; Bermann M; Garcia ALS; Misztal I J Anim Sci; 2021 Feb; 99(2):. PubMed ID: 33544869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Application of genomic evaluation to dairy cattle in New Zealand. Winkelman AM; Johnson DL; Harris BL J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jan; 98(1):659-75. PubMed ID: 25468702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs. Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracies of genomic prediction of feed efficiency traits using different prediction and validation methods in an experimental Nelore cattle population. Silva RM; Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Magalhães AF; Irano N; Carvalheiro R; Canesin RC; Mercadante ME; Boligon AA; Baldi FS; Misztal I; Albuquerque LG J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3613-3623. PubMed ID: 27898889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]