These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30368127)
41. Towards multi-breed genomic evaluations for female fertility of tropical beef cattle. Hayes BJ; Corbet NJ; Allen JM; Laing AR; Fordyce G; Lyons R; McGowan MR; Burns BM J Anim Sci; 2019 Jan; 97(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 30371787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Opportunities for genomic prediction for fertility using endocrine and classical fertility traits in dairy cattle. Tenghe AM; Berglund B; Wall E; Veerkamp RF; de Koning DJ J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3645-3654. PubMed ID: 27898905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Genomic selection for tolerance to heat stress in Australian dairy cattle. Nguyen TTT; Bowman PJ; Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):2849-2862. PubMed ID: 27037467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accuracy of breeding values in small genotyped populations using different sources of external information-A simulation study. Andonov S; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Pocrnic I; Tsuruta S; Misztal I J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):395-401. PubMed ID: 28341049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits. Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses. Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Development of genomic predictions for harvest and carcass weight in channel catfish. Garcia ALS; Bosworth B; Waldbieser G; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):66. PubMed ID: 30547740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The impact of clustering methods for cross-validation, choice of phenotypes, and genotyping strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictions. Baller JL; Howard JT; Kachman SD; Spangler ML J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1534-1549. PubMed ID: 30721970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Multivariate genomic predictions for age at puberty in tropically adapted beef heifers. Engle BN; Corbet NJ; Allen JM; Laing AR; Fordyce G; McGowan MR; Burns BM; Lyons RE; Hayes BJ J Anim Sci; 2019 Jan; 97(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 30481306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers. Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Domestic estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values of bulls in comparison with their foreign genomic enhanced breeding values. Přibyl J; Bauer J; Čermák V; Pešek P; Přibylová J; Šplíchal J; Vostrá-Vydrová H; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1635-42. PubMed ID: 26133272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Expanding the application of haplotype-based genomic predictions to the wild: A case of antibody response against Teladorsagia circumcincta in Soay sheep. Vahedi SM; Salek Ardetani S; Brito LF; Karimi K; Pahlavan Afshari K; Banabazi MH BMC Genomics; 2023 Jun; 24(1):335. PubMed ID: 37330501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle. Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Using the unified relationship matrix adjusted by breed-wise allele frequencies in genomic evaluation of a multibreed population. Makgahlela ML; Strandén I; Nielsen US; Sillanpää MJ; Mäntysaari EA J Dairy Sci; 2014 Feb; 97(2):1117-27. PubMed ID: 24342683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The impact of training strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictors in United States Red Angus cattle. Lee J; Kachman SD; Spangler ML J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3406-3414. PubMed ID: 28805929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep. Bolormaa S; Brown DJ; Swan AA; van der Werf JHJ; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD Anim Genet; 2017 Jun; 48(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 28211150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison between genomic predictions using daughter yield deviation and conventional estimated breeding value as response variables. Guo G; Lund MS; Zhang Y; Su G J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Dec; 127(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 21077966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations. Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Prediction of genomic breeding values for dairy traits in Italian Brown and Simmental bulls using a principal component approach. Pintus MA; Gaspa G; Nicolazzi EL; Vicario D; Rossoni A; Ajmone-Marsan P; Nardone A; Dimauro C; Macciotta NP J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jun; 95(6):3390-400. PubMed ID: 22612973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Genomic analysis of cow mortality and milk production using a threshold-linear model. Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ J Dairy Sci; 2017 Sep; 100(9):7295-7305. PubMed ID: 28647327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]