601 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30368446)
1. Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review.
Griffiths A; Toovey R; Morgan PE; Spittle AJ
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e021734. PubMed ID: 30368446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The validity and reliability of observational assessment tools available to measure fundamental movement skills in school-age children: A systematic review.
Eddy LH; Bingham DD; Crossley KL; Shahid NF; Ellingham-Khan M; Otteslev A; Figueredo NS; Mon-Williams M; Hill LJB
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237919. PubMed ID: 32841268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age band 1 of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition: exploring its usefulness in mainland China.
Hua J; Gu G; Meng W; Wu Z
Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Feb; 34(2):801-8. PubMed ID: 23220119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter- and Intrarater Reliabilities of the Test of Gross Motor Development-Third Edition Among Experienced TGMD-2 Raters.
Maeng H; Webster EK; Pitchford EA; Ulrich DA
Adapt Phys Activ Q; 2017 Oct; 34(4):442-455. PubMed ID: 29035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric comparisons of three measures for assessing motor functions in preschoolers with intellectual disabilities.
Wuang YP; Su CY; Huang MH
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2012 Jun; 56(6):567-78. PubMed ID: 21988314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the measurement properties of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 by applying the COSMIN methodology.
Zhu Y; Hu J; Ye W; Korivi M; Qian Y
Ital J Pediatr; 2024 Apr; 50(1):87. PubMed ID: 38659062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3) with the Use of Visual Supports for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Validity and Reliability.
Allen KA; Bredero B; Van Damme T; Ulrich DA; Simons J
J Autism Dev Disord; 2017 Mar; 47(3):813-833. PubMed ID: 28091840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The development of a short form of the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 in Brazilian children: Validity and reliability.
Valentini NC; Rudisill ME; Bandeira PFR; Hastie PA
Child Care Health Dev; 2018 Sep; 44(5):759-765. PubMed ID: 30043393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Convergent validity of two motor skill tests used to assess school-age children.
Lane H; Brown T
Scand J Occup Ther; 2015 May; 22(3):161-72. PubMed ID: 25328127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of the test of gross motor development: A systematic review.
Rey E; Carballo-Fazanes A; Varela-Casal C; Abelairas-Gómez C;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236070. PubMed ID: 32673358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concurrent Validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 at 18 Months.
Gill K; Osiovich A; Synnes A; A Agnew J; Grunau RE; Miller SP; Zwicker JG
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2019; 39(5):514-524. PubMed ID: 30541412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychometric Properties of the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 for Children With Visual Impairments.
Brian A; Taunton S; Lieberman LJ; Haibach-Beach P; Foley J; Santarossa S
Adapt Phys Activ Q; 2018 Apr; 35(2):145-158. PubMed ID: 29523021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the validity of the MAND in assessing motor impairment in young children.
Brantner S; Piek JP; Smith LM
Rehabil Psychol; 2009 Nov; 54(4):413-421. PubMed ID: 19929123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayley-III motor scale and neurological examination at 2 years do not predict motor skills at 4.5 years.
Burakevych N; Mckinlay CJ; Alsweiler JM; Wouldes TA; Harding JE;
Dev Med Child Neurol; 2017 Feb; 59(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 27543144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and validity of the TGMD-2 in primary-school-age children with visual impairments.
Houwen S; Hartman E; Jonker L; Visscher C
Adapt Phys Activ Q; 2010 Apr; 27(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 20440025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychometric assessment of the French European Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ-FE).
Ray-Kaeser S; Thommen E; Martini R; Jover M; Gurtner B; Bertrand AM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217280. PubMed ID: 31120966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of motor development and function in preschool children.
Tieman BL; Palisano RJ; Sutlive AC
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2005; 11(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 16161086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of the fine motor scale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2.
van Hartingsveldt MJ; Cup EH; Oostendorp RA
Occup Ther Int; 2005; 12(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 15962696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ecological validity of the German Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency - 2nd Edition.
Vinçon S; Green D; Blank R; Jenetzky E
Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Jun; 53():45-54. PubMed ID: 27832925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 for Brazilian children.
Valentini NC
J Mot Behav; 2012; 44(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 22857518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
