These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30369404)
1. Accuracy of implant placement with a computer-aided fabricated surgical template with guided parallel pins: A pilot study. Chang RJ; Chen HL; Huang LG; Wong YK J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Nov; 81(11):970-976. PubMed ID: 30369404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial. Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning. Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Soehardi RA; Xi T; de Haan AF; Schutyser F; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 25181255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery. Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Printed Templates for Guided Implant Placement Based on Matching a Surface Scan with CBCT. Kernen F; Benic GI; Payer M; Schär A; Müller-Gerbl M; Filippi A; Kühl S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):762-8. PubMed ID: 25923363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography-derived laboratory-based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Knierim K; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 21443593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery by a CAD/CAM and laser scanning technique. Zhao XZ; Xu WH; Tang ZH; Wu MJ; Zhu J; Chen S Chin J Dent Res; 2014; 17(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 25028687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches. Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique. Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study. Chen X; Yuan J; Wang C; Huang Y; Kang L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Implant Placement Guided with Surgical Template: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study. Zhou M; Zhou H; Li SY; Yang XB; Geng YM; Che YJ Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2021; 41(2):e55-e62. PubMed ID: 33819327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides. Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study. Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]