These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30369892)

  • 1. The Effect of Faking on the Correlation Between Two Ordinal Variables: Some Population and Monte Carlo Results.
    Bressan M; Rosseel Y; Lombardi L
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1876. PubMed ID: 30369892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical Scenarios of Fake Data Analysis: The Sample Generation by Replacement (SGR) Approach.
    Pastore M; Nucci M; Bobbio A; Lombardi L
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():482. PubMed ID: 28469584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cyberfaking: I can, so I will? Intentions to fake in online psychological testing.
    Grieve R; Elliott J
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 May; 16(5):364-9. PubMed ID: 23574347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of Fit Indices to Fake Perturbation of Ordinal Data: A Sample by Replacement Approach.
    Lombardi L; Pastore M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Jul; 47(4):519-46. PubMed ID: 26777668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of normality and outliers on bivariate correlation coefficients in psychology: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ventura-León J; Peña-Calero BN; Burga-León A
    J Gen Psychol; 2023; 150(4):405-422. PubMed ID: 35792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population models and simulation methods: The case of the Spearman rank correlation.
    Astivia OLO; Zumbo BD
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):347-367. PubMed ID: 28140458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How accurate is the Pearson r-from-Z approximation? A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Hittner JB; May K
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 24836910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.
    Komar S; Brown DJ; Komar JA; Robie C
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 18211141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The "g" in Faking: Doublethink the Validity of Personality Self-Report Measures for Applicant Selection.
    Geiger M; Olderbak S; Sauter R; Wilhelm O
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2153. PubMed ID: 30483179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To transform or not transform skewed data for psychometric analysis: that is the question!
    Norris AE; Aroian KJ
    Nurs Res; 2004; 53(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 14726780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection Of Faking on the Comrey Personality Scales.
    Comrey AL; Backer TE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1975 Jul; 10(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 26829632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ezekiel's classic estimator of the population squared multiple correlation coefficient: Monte Carlo-based extensions and refinements.
    Hittner JB
    J Gen Psychol; 2020; 147(3):213-227. PubMed ID: 31648628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Faking self-reports of health behavior: a comparison between a within- and a between-subjects design.
    Egele VS; Kiefer LH; Stark R
    Health Psychol Behav Med; 2021; 9(1):895-916. PubMed ID: 34712514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing Bias and Error in the Correlation Coefficient Due to Nonnormality.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 75(5):785-804. PubMed ID: 29795841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correction for faking in self-report personality tests.
    Sjöberg L
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 26043667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of conversion formula for effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    Poom L; Af Wåhlberg A
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 Jul; 13(4):508-519. PubMed ID: 35426259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.