These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30370279)

  • 1. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.
    Jozwiak M; Monnet X; Teboul JL
    Ann Transl Med; 2018 Sep; 6(18):352. PubMed ID: 30370279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update.
    Monnet X; Marik PE; Teboul JL
    Ann Intensive Care; 2016 Dec; 6(1):111. PubMed ID: 27858374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monitoring volume and fluid responsiveness: from static to dynamic indicators.
    Guerin L; Monnet X; Teboul JL
    Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2013 Jun; 27(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 24012230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictors of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alvarado Sánchez JI; Caicedo Ruiz JD; Diaztagle Fernández JJ; Amaya Zuñiga WF; Ospina-Tascón GA; Cruz Martínez LE
    Ann Intensive Care; 2021 Feb; 11(1):28. PubMed ID: 33555488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How I personalize fluid therapy in septic shock?
    Monnet X; Lai C; Teboul JL
    Crit Care; 2023 Mar; 27(1):123. PubMed ID: 36964573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting fluid responsiveness: A review of literature and a guide for the clinician.
    Jalil BA; Cavallazzi R
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Nov; 36(11):2093-2102. PubMed ID: 30122506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance.
    Monnet X; Bleibtreu A; Ferré A; Dres M; Gharbi R; Richard C; Teboul JL
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 21926581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting fluid responsiveness in children: a systematic review.
    Gan H; Cannesson M; Chandler JR; Ansermino JM
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Dec; 117(6):1380-92. PubMed ID: 24257389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients.
    Monnet X; Teboul JL
    Ann Transl Med; 2020 Jun; 8(12):790. PubMed ID: 32647715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel Methods for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Patients-A Narrative Review.
    Horejsek J; Kunstyr J; Michalek P; Porizka M
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35204603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?
    Monnet X; Shi R; Teboul JL
    Ann Intensive Care; 2022 May; 12(1):46. PubMed ID: 35633423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Volume responsiveness.
    Monnet X; Teboul JL
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2007 Oct; 13(5):549-53. PubMed ID: 17762234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. End-expiratory occlusion test predicts preload responsiveness independently of positive end-expiratory pressure during acute respiratory distress syndrome.
    Silva S; Jozwiak M; Teboul JL; Persichini R; Richard C; Monnet X
    Crit Care Med; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1692-701. PubMed ID: 23774335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a positive end-expiratory pressure-induced reduction in stroke volume indicate preload responsiveness? An experimental study.
    Lambert P; Sloth E; Smith B; Hansen LK; Koefoed-Nielsen J; Tønnesen E; Larsson A
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Apr; 51(4):415-25. PubMed ID: 17378779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Will This Hemodynamically Unstable Patient Respond to a Bolus of Intravenous Fluids?
    Bentzer P; Griesdale DE; Boyd J; MacLean K; Sirounis D; Ayas NT
    JAMA; 2016 Sep; 316(12):1298-309. PubMed ID: 27673307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of preload and fluid responsiveness in intensive care unit. How good are we?
    Mohsenin V
    J Crit Care; 2015 Jun; 30(3):567-73. PubMed ID: 25682347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emerging trends in minimally invasive haemodynamic monitoring and optimization of fluid therapy.
    Benington S; Ferris P; Nirmalan M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Nov; 26(11):893-905. PubMed ID: 19667998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Where Are We Heading With Fluid Responsiveness and Septic Shock?
    Megri M; Fridenmaker E; Disselkamp M
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e23795. PubMed ID: 35518529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Passive leg raising test with minimally invasive monitoring: the way forward for guiding septic shock resuscitation?
    Honore PM; Spapen HD
    J Intensive Care; 2017; 5():36. PubMed ID: 28616241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients.
    Monnet X; Osman D; Ridel C; Lamia B; Richard C; Teboul JL
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Mar; 37(3):951-6. PubMed ID: 19237902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.