These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30370800)

  • 1. Measurement of pitch perception as a function of cochlear implant electrode and its effect on speech perception with different frequency allocations.
    Grasmeder ML; Verschuur CA; van Besouw RM; Wheatley AMH; Newman TA
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 58(3):158-166. PubMed ID: 30370800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience.
    Reiss LA; Ito RA; Eggleston JL; Liao S; Becker JJ; Lakin CE; Warren FM; McMenomey SO
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e23-34. PubMed ID: 25319401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association Between Flat-Panel Computed Tomographic Imaging-Guided Place-Pitch Mapping and Speech and Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jiam NT; Gilbert M; Cooke D; Jiradejvong P; Barrett K; Caldwell M; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Feb; 145(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 30477013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing.
    Nelson DA; Van Tasell DJ; Schroder AC; Soli S; Levine S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1987-99. PubMed ID: 7593921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Hanekom JJ; Shannon RV
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1996; 43():27-40. PubMed ID: 9265842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of lower frequency-to-electrode allocations on speech and pitch perception with the hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.
    Reiss LA; Perreau AE; Turner CW
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(6):357-72. PubMed ID: 22907151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity.
    Donaldson GS; Dawson PK; Borden LZ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 21084987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perception.
    Reiss LA; Gantz BJ; Turner CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 18025998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes.
    Kenway B; Tam YC; Vanat Z; Harris F; Gray R; Birchall J; Carlyon R; Axon P
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1472-9. PubMed ID: 26375968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 22733121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Vandali A; Dawson P; Au A; Yu Y; Brown M; Goorevich M; Cowan R
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30067558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.
    Landsberger DM; Svrakic M; Roland JT; Svirsky M
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e207-13. PubMed ID: 25860624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Channel discrimination along all contacts of the cochlear implant electrode array and its relation to speech perception.
    Biesheuvel JD; Briaire JJ; de Jong MAM; Boehringer S; Frijns JHM
    Int J Audiol; 2019 May; 58(5):262-268. PubMed ID: 30890005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
    Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.