284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30371244)
21. Mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated surgical aortic bioprosthesis: Insights from PARTNER 2 Valve-in-Valve Registry.
Murdoch DJ; Sathananthan J; Hensey M; Alu MC; Liu Y; Crowley A; Wood D; Cheung A; Ye J; Feldman T; Hahn RT; Jaber WA; Mack MJ; Malaisrie SC; Leon MB; Webb JG
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Oct; 96(4):981-986. PubMed ID: 32118351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Isolated Redo Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Valve Replacement.
Patel PM; Chiou E; Cao Y; Binongo J; Guyton RA; Leshnower B; Grubb KJ; Chen EP
Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Aug; 112(2):539-545. PubMed ID: 33129775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement of Failed Surgically Implanted Bioprostheses: The STS/ACC Registry.
Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR; Vemulapalli S; Carroll JD; Holmes DR; Mack MJ; Thourani VH; Grover FL; Brennan JM; Suri RM; Dai D; Svensson LG
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 72(4):370-382. PubMed ID: 30025572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture Improves the Hemodynamic Results of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Chhatriwalla AK; Allen KB; Saxon JT; Cohen DJ; Aggarwal S; Hart AJ; Baron SJ; Dvir D; Borkon AM
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 28698291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A systematic review on durability and structural valve deterioration in TAVR and surgical AVR.
Okutucu S; Niazi AK; Oliveira D; Fatihoglu SG; Oto A
Acta Cardiol; 2021 Nov; 76(9):921-932. PubMed ID: 33302806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hemodynamic Outcome and Valve Durability Beyond Five Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Murray MI; Hofmann E; De Rosa R; Mas-Peiro S; Seppelt P; Walther T; Zeiher AM; Fichtlscherer S; Vasa-Nicotera M
J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Mar; 32(3):82-87. PubMed ID: 32123140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of structural valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure utilizing the new European consensus definition in patients undergoing TAVI with first-generation devices: Outcomes beyond 5 years from a single center in Turkey.
Şentürk B; Dursun H; Çöllüoğlu T; Özdamar H; Ekin T; Tanrıverdi Z; Kaya D
Anatol J Cardiol; 2021 Aug; 25(8):579-587. PubMed ID: 34369886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Within Degenerated Aortic Surgical Bioprostheses: PARTNER 2 Valve-in-Valve Registry.
Webb JG; Mack MJ; White JM; Dvir D; Blanke P; Herrmann HC; Leipsic J; Kodali SK; Makkar R; Miller DC; Pibarot P; Pichard A; Satler LF; Svensson L; Alu MC; Suri RM; Leon MB
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 May; 69(18):2253-2262. PubMed ID: 28473128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Structural Deterioration of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Bioprostheses in the PARTNER-2 Trial.
Pibarot P; Ternacle J; Jaber WA; Salaun E; Dahou A; Asch FM; Weissman NJ; Rodriguez L; Xu K; Annabi MS; Guzzetti E; Beaudoin J; Bernier M; Leipsic J; Blanke P; Clavel MA; Rogers E; Alu MC; Douglas PS; Makkar R; Miller DC; Kapadia SR; Mack MJ; Webb JG; Kodali SK; Smith CR; Herrmann HC; Thourani VH; Leon MB; Hahn RT;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 76(16):1830-1843. PubMed ID: 33059828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Failed Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Valves.
Tarantini G; Sathananthan J; Fabris T; Landes U; Bapat VN; Khan JM; Nai Fovino L; Zaid S; Van Mieghem NM; Latib A; Waksman R; De Backer O; Rogers T; Søndergaard L; Tang GHL
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Sep; 15(18):1777-1793. PubMed ID: 36137681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahmed A; Levy KH
J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2486-2495. PubMed ID: 33797799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Self-Expanding Bioprostheses for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: SCOPE 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Tamburino C; Bleiziffer S; Thiele H; Scholtz S; Hildick-Smith D; Cunnington M; Wolf A; Barbanti M; Tchetchè D; Garot P; Pagnotta P; Gilard M; Bedogni F; Van Belle E; Vasa-Nicotera M; Chieffo A; Deutsch O; Kempfert J; Søndergaard L; Butter C; Trillo-Nouche R; Lotfi S; Möllmann H; Joner M; Abdel-Wahab M; Bogaerts K; Hengstenberg C; Capodanno D
Circulation; 2020 Dec; 142(25):2431-2442. PubMed ID: 33054367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Incidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial cohort--a analysis.
Pibarot P; Weissman NJ; Stewart WJ; Hahn RT; Lindman BR; McAndrew T; Kodali SK; Mack MJ; Thourani VH; Miller DC; Svensson LG; Herrmann HC; Smith CR; Rodés-Cabau J; Webb J; Lim S; Xu K; Hueter I; Douglas PS; Leon MB
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Sep; 64(13):1323-34. PubMed ID: 25257633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable TAVR in Patients with a Small Aortic Annulus.
Herrmann HC; Mehran R; Blackman DJ; Bailey S; Möllmann H; Abdel-Wahab M; Ben Ali W; Mahoney PD; Ruge H; Wood DA; Bleiziffer S; Ramlawi B; Gada H; Petronio AS; Resor CD; Merhi W; Garcia Del Blanco B; Attizzani GF; Batchelor WB; Gillam LD; Guerrero M; Rogers T; Rovin JD; Szerlip M; Whisenant B; Deeb GM; Grubb KJ; Padang R; Fan MT; Althouse AD; Tchétché D;
N Engl J Med; 2024 Jun; 390(21):1959-1971. PubMed ID: 38587261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).
Capodanno D; Petronio AS; Prendergast B; Eltchaninoff H; Vahanian A; Modine T; Lancellotti P; Sondergaard L; Ludman PF; Tamburino C; Piazza N; Hancock J; Mehilli J; Byrne RA; Baumbach A; Kappetein AP; Windecker S; Bax J; Haude M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Sep; 52(3):408-417. PubMed ID: 28874031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo aortic valve replacement: which procedure for which patient?
Hutt E; Mehra N; Desai MY
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2022 Dec; 20(12):911-918. PubMed ID: 36433699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Early Outcomes for Valve-in-valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Degenerative Freestyle Bioprostheses.
Sang SLW; Beute T; Heiser J; Berkompas D; Fanning J; Merhi W
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Autumn; 30(3):262-268. PubMed ID: 29158054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
