142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30372110)
41. Biological motion gains preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression: Local biological motion matters.
Sun Y; Wang X; Huang Y; Ji H; Ding X
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Feb; 151(2):309-320. PubMed ID: 34351192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Unconscious fear influences emotional awareness of faces and voices.
de Gelder B; Morris JS; Dolan RJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Dec; 102(51):18682-7. PubMed ID: 16352717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search.
Calvo MG; Nummenmaa L
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):471-94. PubMed ID: 18729711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Rejection sensitivity is a mediator between borderline personality disorder features and facial trust appraisal.
Miano A; Fertuck EA; Arntz A; Stanley B
J Pers Disord; 2013 Aug; 27(4):442-56. PubMed ID: 23586933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Dynamic variations in affective priming.
Wong PS; Root JC
Conscious Cogn; 2003 Jun; 12(2):147-68. PubMed ID: 12763002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Reversal of the face-inversion effect in N170 under unconscious visual processing.
Suzuki M; Noguchi Y
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Feb; 51(3):400-9. PubMed ID: 23196145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Dynamic face mask enhances continuous flash suppression.
Han S; Alais D; Palmer C
Cognition; 2021 Jan; 206():104473. PubMed ID: 33080453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions.
Dimberg U; Thunberg M; Elmehed K
Psychol Sci; 2000 Jan; 11(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 11228851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The obligatory nature of holistic processing of faces in social judgments.
Todorov A; Loehr V; Oosterhof NN
Perception; 2010; 39(4):514-32. PubMed ID: 20514999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Emotional context influences access of visual stimuli to anxious individuals' awareness.
Ruderman L; Lamy D
Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):900-14. PubMed ID: 22342536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Beyond personality traits: Which facial expressions imply dominance in two-person interaction scenes?
Ueda Y; Yoshikawa S
Emotion; 2018 Sep; 18(6):872-885. PubMed ID: 28872339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Binocular rivalry: a window into emotional processing in aging.
Bannerman RL; Regener P; Sahraie A
Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 21443353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Unconscious response priming during continuous flash suppression.
Koivisto M; Grassini S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192201. PubMed ID: 29401503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The importance of awareness in face processing: A critical review of interocular suppression studies.
Lanfranco RC; Rabagliati H; Carmel D
Behav Brain Res; 2023 Feb; 437():114116. PubMed ID: 36113728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Fearful faces have a sensory advantage in the competition for awareness.
Hedger N; Adams WJ; Garner M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1748-57. PubMed ID: 26280260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Object Localization Does Not Imply Awareness of Object Category at the Break of Continuous Flash Suppression.
Kobylka F; Persike M; Meinhardt G
Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():312. PubMed ID: 28663728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Adults' awareness of faces follows newborns' looking preferences.
Stein T; Peelen MV; Sterzer P
PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29361. PubMed ID: 22216259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Testing the idea of privileged awareness of self-relevant information.
Stein T; Siebold A; van Zoest W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 26727020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Raising the alarm: Individual differences in the perceptual awareness of masked facial expressions.
Damjanovic L; Meyer M; Sepulveda F
Brain Cogn; 2017 Jun; 114():1-10. PubMed ID: 28258035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. You are what I feel: A test of the affective realism hypothesis.
Wormwood JB; Siegel EH; Kopec J; Quigley KS; Barrett LF
Emotion; 2019 Aug; 19(5):788-798. PubMed ID: 30138005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
