These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30372647)
1. INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term. Pritchard N; Lindquist A; Siqueira IDA; Walker SP; Permezel M J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):961-966. PubMed ID: 30372647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Anderson NH; Sadler LC; McKinlay CJD; McCowan LME Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):509.e1-509.e7. PubMed ID: 26546850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study. Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study. Vieira MC; Relph S; Persson M; Seed PT; Pasupathy D PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002902. PubMed ID: 31539391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21 Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the role of maternal race on the prediction of NICU admission by three growth charts: a cross-sectional study. Nahirney M; Chaput KH; Metcalfe A J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Apr; 34(8):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 31189402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Customized birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity. McCowan LM; Harding JE; Stewart AW BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1026-33. PubMed ID: 16045513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial. Meek CL; Corcoy R; Asztalos E; Kusinski LC; López E; Feig DS; Murphy HR; BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jan; 21(1):96. PubMed ID: 33514342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performances of birthweight charts to predict adverse perinatal outcomes related to SGA in a cohort of nulliparas. Galvão RB; Souza RT; Vieira MC; Pasupathy D; Mayrink J; Feitosa FE; Rocha Filho EA; Leite DF; Vettorazzi J; Calderon IM; Sousa MH; Cecatti JG; BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Aug; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 35927626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study. Choi SKY; Gordon A; Hilder L; Henry A; Hyett JA; Brew BK; Joseph F; Jorm L; Chambers GM Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adverse perinatal outcomes in immigrants: A ten-year population-based observational study and assessment of growth charts. Choi SKY; Henry A; Hilder L; Gordon A; Jorm L; Chambers GM Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 33(6):421-432. PubMed ID: 31476081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Madden JV; Flatley CJ; Kumar S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):525.e1-525.e9. PubMed ID: 29462628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stillbirth risk and smallness for gestational age according to Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO, and GROW fetal weight standards: analysis by maternal ethnicity and body mass index. Gardosi J; Hugh O Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Nov; 229(5):547.e1-547.e13. PubMed ID: 37247647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Customized fetal growth standard compared with the INTERGROWTH-21st century standard at predicting small-for-gestational-age neonates. Odibo AO; Nwabuobi C; Odibo L; Leavitt K; Obican S; Tuuli MG Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Nov; 97(11):1381-1387. PubMed ID: 29878301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study. Tarca AL; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Erez O; Hernandez-Andrade E; Yeo L; Bhatti G; Pacora P; Maymon E; Hassan SS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S679-S691.e4. PubMed ID: 29422207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. INTERGROWTH-21st versus a customized method for the prediction of neonatal nutritional status in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Fernández-Alba JJ; Castillo Lara M; Sánchez Mera R; Aragón Baizán S; González Macías C; Quintero Prado R; Vilar Sánchez A; Jimenez Heras JM; Moreno Corral LJ; Figueras F BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Feb; 22(1):136. PubMed ID: 35183148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Small-for-gestational-age infants classified by customized or population birthweight centiles: impact of gestational age at delivery. Groom KM; Poppe KK; North RA; McCowan LM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):239.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17826403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences When Classifying Small for Gestational Age Preterm Infants According to the Growth Chart Applied. Estañ-Capell J; Alarcón-Torres B; Miró-Pedro M; Martínez-Costa C Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1212-e1219. PubMed ID: 36709759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]