BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30373765)

  • 1. Win-Concurrent Sensory Cues Can Promote Riskier Choice.
    Cherkasova MV; Clark L; Barton JJS; Schulzer M; Shafiee M; Kingstone A; Stoessl AJ; Winstanley CA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(48):10362-10370. PubMed ID: 30373765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dopamine D3 Receptors Modulate the Ability of Win-Paired Cues to Increase Risky Choice in a Rat Gambling Task.
    Barrus MM; Winstanley CA
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):785-94. PubMed ID: 26791209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prior Exposure to Salient Win-Paired Cues in a Rat Gambling Task Increases Sensitivity to Cocaine Self-Administration and Suppresses Dopamine Efflux in Nucleus Accumbens: Support for the Reward Deficiency Hypothesis of Addiction.
    Ferland JN; Hynes TJ; Hounjet CD; Lindenbach D; Vonder Haar C; Adams WK; Phillips AG; Winstanley CA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 39(10):1842-1854. PubMed ID: 30626700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. D
    Mortazavi L; Hynes TJ; Chernoff CS; Ramaiah S; Brodie HG; Russell B; Hathaway BA; Kaur S; Winstanley CA
    J Neurosci; 2023 Feb; 43(6):979-992. PubMed ID: 36623876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative insensitivity to time-out punishments induced by win-paired cues in a rat gambling task.
    Langdon AJ; Hathaway BA; Zorowitz S; Harris CBW; Winstanley CA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Aug; 236(8):2543-2556. PubMed ID: 31256220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pharmacological evidence that 5-HT
    Adams WK; Barkus C; Ferland JN; Sharp T; Winstanley CA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Oct; 234(20):3091-3104. PubMed ID: 28733811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased motor impulsivity in a rat gambling task during chronic ropinirole treatment: potentiation by win-paired audiovisual cues.
    Tremblay M; Barrus MM; Cocker PJ; Baunez C; Winstanley CA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Jun; 236(6):1901-1915. PubMed ID: 30706098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pharmacological evidence of a cholinergic contribution to elevated impulsivity and risky decision-making caused by adding win-paired cues to a rat gambling task.
    Betts GD; Hynes TJ; Winstanley CA
    J Psychopharmacol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):701-712. PubMed ID: 33573446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dopamine activity in the nigrostriatal pathway alters cue-induced risky choice patterns in female rats.
    Hathaway BA; Li A; Brodie HG; Silveira MM; Tremblay M; Seo YS; Winstanley CA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2024 Apr; 59(7):1621-1637. PubMed ID: 38369911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sign tracking predicts suboptimal behavior in a rodent gambling task.
    Swintosky M; Brennan JT; Koziel C; Paulus JP; Morrison SE
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Sep; 238(9):2645-2660. PubMed ID: 34191111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Win-Paired Cues Modulate the Effect of Dopamine Neuron Sensitization on Decision Making and Cocaine Self-administration: Divergent Effects Across Sex.
    Hynes TJ; Chernoff CS; Hrelja KM; Tse MTL; Avramidis DK; Lysenko-Martin MR; Calderhead L; Kaur S; Floresco SB; Winstanley CA
    Biol Psychiatry; 2024 Feb; 95(3):220-230. PubMed ID: 37673411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of winning cues and relative payout on choice between simulated slot machines.
    Spetch ML; Madan CR; Liu YS; Ludvig EA
    Addiction; 2020 Sep; 115(9):1719-1727. PubMed ID: 32056323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling decision-making under uncertainty: A direct comparison study between human and mouse gambling data.
    Cabeza L; Giustiniani J; Chabin T; Ramadan B; Joucla C; Nicolier M; Pazart L; Haffen E; Fellmann D; Gabriel D; Peterschmitt Y
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2020 Feb; 31():58-68. PubMed ID: 31837913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk-promoting effects of reward-paired cues in human sign- and goal-trackers.
    Cherkasova MV; Clark L; Barton JJS; Stoessl AJ; Winstanley CA
    Behav Brain Res; 2024 Mar; 461():114865. PubMed ID: 38220058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Basolateral amygdala - nucleus accumbens circuitry regulates optimal cue-guided risk/reward decision making.
    van Holstein M; MacLeod PE; Floresco SB
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2020 Mar; 98():109830. PubMed ID: 31811876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testosterone is positively associated with risk taking in the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Stanton SJ; Liening SH; Schultheiss OC
    Horm Behav; 2011 Feb; 59(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 21167166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A developmental study of risky decisions on the cake gambling task: age and gender analyses of probability estimation and reward evaluation.
    Van Leijenhorst L; Westenberg PM; Crone EA
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2008; 33(2):179-96. PubMed ID: 18443976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Serotonin 2C Antagonism in the Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex Ameliorates Cue-Enhanced Risk Preference and Restores Sensitivity to Reinforcer Devaluation in Male Rats.
    Hathaway BA; Schumacher JD; Hrelja KM; Winstanley CA
    eNeuro; 2021; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 34815296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Missed losses loom larger than missed gains: Electrodermal reactivity to decision choices and outcomes in a gambling task.
    Wu Y; Van Dijk E; Aitken M; Clark L
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):353-61. PubMed ID: 26667365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of cocaine-related cues to concurrent monetary choice in humans.
    Strickland JC; Marks KR; Beckmann JS; Lile JA; Rush CR; Stoops WW
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Oct; 235(10):2871-2881. PubMed ID: 30046863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.