These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30373779)

  • 1. Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to promote quality of care in the management of patients with established kidney disease requiring treatment with haemodialysis in the UK (PROM-HD): a qualitative study protocol.
    Anderson NE; Calvert M; Cockwell P; Dutton M; Aiyegbusi OL; Kyte D
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e021532. PubMed ID: 30373779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using patient-reported outcome measures during the management of patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring treatment with haemodialysis (PROM-HD): a qualitative study.
    Anderson NE; McMullan C; Calvert M; Dutton M; Cockwell P; Aiyegbusi OL; Kyte D
    BMJ Open; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e052629. PubMed ID: 34446501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to promote quality of care and safety in the management of patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney disease (PRO-trACK project): a mixed-methods project protocol.
    Aiyegbusi OL; Kyte D; Cockwell P; Marshall T; Dutton M; Slade A; Marklew N; Price G; Verdi R; Waters J; Sharpe K; Calvert M
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e016687. PubMed ID: 28667225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "You need a team": perspectives on interdisciplinary symptom management using patient-reported outcome measures in hemodialysis care-a qualitative study.
    Baragar B; Schick-Makaroff K; Manns B; Love S; Donald M; Santana M; Corradetti B; Finlay J; Johnson JA; Walsh M; Elliott MJ
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2023 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 36662325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia.
    Duncanson E; Bennett PN; Viecelli A; Dansie K; Handke W; Tong A; Palmer S; Jesudason S; McDonald SP; Morton RL;
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e039014. PubMed ID: 33158824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Symptom Monitoring with Feedback Trial (SWIFT): protocol for a registry-based cluster randomised controlled trial in haemodialysis.
    Greenham L; Bennett PN; Dansie K; Viecelli AK; Jesudason S; Mister R; Smyth B; Westall P; Herzog S; Brown C; Handke W; Palmer SC; Caskey FJ; Couchoud C; Simes J; McDonald SP; Morton RL
    Trials; 2022 May; 23(1):419. PubMed ID: 35590395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Management of Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study.
    Aiyegbusi OL; Kyte D; Cockwell P; Marshall T; Dutton M; Walmsley-Allen N; Slade A; McMullan C; Calvert M
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2019 Aug; 74(2):167-178. PubMed ID: 31003865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A patient-centred approach to measuring quality in kidney care: patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures.
    Aiyegbusi OL; Kyte D; Cockwell P; Anderson N; Calvert M
    Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 26(6):442-449. PubMed ID: 28806191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Embedding electronic patient-reported outcome measures into routine care for patients with stage III MELanoma (ePROMs-MEL): protocol for a prospective, longitudinal, mixed-methods pilot study.
    Dempsey K; Saw R; Bartula I; Lo S; Lawn C; Pennington T; Spillane A; Boyle F; Dong S; Dieng M; Milne D; Seaman L; Saks D; Lai-Kwon J; Thompson JR; Morton R
    BMJ Open; 2022 Dec; 12(12):e066852. PubMed ID: 36600423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collection and determinants of patient reported outcome measures in haemodialysis patients in Scotland.
    Nimmo A; Bell S; Brunton C; Campbell J; Doyle A; MacKinnon B; Peel RK; Robertson S; Shilliday I; Spalding E; Traynor JP; Metcalfe W;
    QJM; 2018 Jan; 111(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 29025150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cluster randomized controlled trial for the Evaluation of routinely Measured PATient reported outcomes in HemodialYsis care (EMPATHY): a study protocol.
    Johnson JA; Al Sayah F; Buzinski R; Corradetti B; Davison SN; Elliott MJ; Klarenbach S; Manns B; Schick-Makaroff K; Short H; Thomas C; Walsh M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Aug; 20(1):731. PubMed ID: 32778102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facing the challenges of PROM implementation in Dutch dialysis care: Patients' and professionals' perspectives.
    Sipma WS; de Jong MFC; Meuleman Y; Hemmelder MH; Ahaus KCTB
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285822. PubMed ID: 37186606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discussing results of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients and healthcare professionals in routine dialysis care: a qualitative study.
    van der Willik EM; Milders J; Bart JAJ; Bos WJW; van Ittersum FJ; Ten Dam MAGJ; Hemmelder MH; Dekker FW; Meuleman Y
    BMJ Open; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e067044. PubMed ID: 36396312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in renal units in Australia and New Zealand: A cross-sectional survey study.
    Morton RL; Lioufas N; Dansie K; Palmer SC; Jose MD; Raj R; Salmon A; Sypek M; Tong A; Ludlow M; Boudville N; McDonald S
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2020 Jan; 25(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 30838732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-reported MeasUrement of Physical and PsychosOcial Symptoms Response Tool (SUPPORT-dialysis): systematic symptom assessment and management in patients on in-centre haemodialysis - a parallel arm, non-randomised feasibility pilot study protocol.
    Gill JK; Pucci M; Samudio A; Ahmed T; Siddiqui R; Edwards N; Marticorena RM; Donnelly S; Lok C; Wentlandt K; Wolofsky K; Mucsi I
    BMJ Open; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e080712. PubMed ID: 38296283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Do Orthopaedists Believe is Needed for Incorporating Patient-reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Care? A Qualitative Study.
    Whitebird RR; Solberg LI; Ziegenfuss JY; Norton CK; Chrenka EA; Swiontkowski M; Reams M; Grossman ES
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Apr; 480(4):680-687. PubMed ID: 34846308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgeon Perceptions of the Integration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Practice.
    Driscoll B; Leonard LD; Kovar A; Billings J; Tevis SE; Kim SP; Cumbler E
    J Surg Res; 2022 Dec; 280():486-494. PubMed ID: 36067535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current practices in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of UK trial staff and management.
    Kyte D; Ives J; Draper H; Calvert M
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012281. PubMed ID: 27697875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient and clinician opinions of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of patients with rare diseases: a qualitative study.
    Aiyegbusi OL; Isa F; Kyte D; Pankhurst T; Kerecuk L; Ferguson J; Lipkin G; Calvert M
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jun; 18(1):177. PubMed ID: 32522194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to routinely collect data on patient-reported outcome and experience measures in renal registries in Europe: an expert consensus meeting.
    Breckenridge K; Bekker HL; Gibbons E; van der Veer SN; Abbott D; Briançon S; Cullen R; Garneata L; Jager KJ; Lønning K; Metcalfe W; Morton RL; Murtagh FE; Prutz K; Robertson S; Rychlik I; Schon S; Sharp L; Speyer E; Tentori F; Caskey FJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1605-14. PubMed ID: 25982327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.