397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30374669)
1. Design of NIRS Probe Based on Computational Model to Find Out the Optimal Location for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation.
Sharma G; Roy Chowdhury S
J Med Syst; 2018 Oct; 42(12):244. PubMed ID: 30374669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cortical Excitability through Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: a Computational Approach.
Arora Y; Chowdhury SR
J Med Syst; 2020 Jan; 44(2):48. PubMed ID: 31900599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).
Alam M; Truong DQ; Khadka N; Bikson M
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(12):4506-21. PubMed ID: 27223853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Electrode Configurations and Injected Current Intensity on the Electrical Field of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Simulation Study
Mackenbach C; Tian R; Yang Y
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():3517-3520. PubMed ID: 33018762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS.
Edwards D; Cortes M; Datta A; Minhas P; Wassermann EM; Bikson M
Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():266-75. PubMed ID: 23370061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost of focality in TDCS: Interindividual variability in electric fields.
Mikkonen M; Laakso I; Tanaka S; Hirata A
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31606449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variation of cerebrospinal fluid in specific regions regulates focality in transcranial direct current stimulation.
Kashyap R; Bhattacharjee S; Bharath RD; Venkatasubramanian G; Udupa K; Bashir S; Oishi K; Desmond JE; Chen SHA; Guan C
Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():952602. PubMed ID: 36118967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.
Datta A; Bansal V; Diaz J; Patel J; Reato D; Bikson M
Brain Stimul; 2009 Oct; 2(4):201-7, 207.e1. PubMed ID: 20648973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Focal Hemodynamic Responses in the Stimulated Hemisphere During High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Muthalib M; Besson P; Rothwell J; Perrey S
Neuromodulation; 2018 Jun; 21(4):348-354. PubMed ID: 28714545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimized APPS-tDCS electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target stimulation magnitude in 3000 electric field models.
Caulfield KA; George MS
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20116. PubMed ID: 36418438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the electric field in the brain during transcranial direct current stimulation: A sensitivity analysis.
Santos L; Martinho M; Salvador R; Wenger C; Fernandes SR; Ripolles O; Ruffini G; Miranda PC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1778-1781. PubMed ID: 28268672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Delayed Memory in Alzheimer's Disease Patients: A Pilot Study Using Computational Modeling to Optimize Electrode Position.
Rasmussen ID; Boayue NM; Mittner M; Bystad M; Grønli OK; Vangberg TR; Csifcsák G; Aslaksen PM
J Alzheimers Dis; 2021; 83(2):753-769. PubMed ID: 34366347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A principled approach to conductivity uncertainty analysis in electric field calculations.
Saturnino GB; Thielscher A; Madsen KH; Knösche TR; Weise K
Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():821-834. PubMed ID: 30594684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of montages and electric currents in tDCS.
Khorrampanah M; Seyedarabi H; Daneshvar S; Farhoudi M
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Oct; 125():103998. PubMed ID: 33039799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Electrode Number on the Performance of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS).
Wang Y; Zhou H; Li Y; Liu W
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():4182-4185. PubMed ID: 30441277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling.
Caulfield KA; Badran BW; DeVries WH; Summers PM; Kofmehl E; Li X; Borckardt JJ; Bikson M; George MS
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(4):961-969. PubMed ID: 32330607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions.
Ho KA; Taylor JL; Chew T; Gálvez V; Alonzo A; Bai S; Dokos S; Loo CK
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26350410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target.
Schmidt C; Wagner S; Burger M; Rienen Uv; Wolters CH
J Neural Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):046028. PubMed ID: 26170066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of large structural brain changes in chronic stroke patients on the electric field caused by transcranial brain stimulation.
Minjoli S; Saturnino GB; Blicher JU; Stagg CJ; Siebner HR; Antunes A; Thielscher A
Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 15():106-117. PubMed ID: 28516033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-resolution head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: A labeling analysis.
Thomas C; Huang Y; Faria PC; Datta A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():6442-6445. PubMed ID: 31947317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
