These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30375058)
1. A bridge to the future: Maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. Prystowsky EN J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1604-1606. PubMed ID: 30375058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Rate vs. rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation--an updated meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials. Chen S; Dong Y; Fan J; Yin Y Int J Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 153(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 21963208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The RACE study in perspective of randomized studies on management of persistent atrial fibrillation. Hagens VE; Van Gelder IC; Crijns HJ; Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Jun; 7(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 14618033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Modern trends in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation]. Abuladze G; Mamamtavrishvili N; Jashi I; Kantaria D; Ambroladze N Georgian Med News; 2005 Apr; (121):59-61. PubMed ID: 15908727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determinants of sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with early-persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure. de With RR; Rienstra M; Crijns HJGM; Van Gelder IC; Clin Res Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 109(6):787-789. PubMed ID: 31784901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rate versus rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: what the trials really say. Crijns HJ Drugs; 2005; 65(12):1651-67. PubMed ID: 16060699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AHA/ACC/ESC 2006 atrial fibrillation guidelines: looking towards the future. Gersh BJ; Packer D Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2007 Feb; 4(2):59. PubMed ID: 17245397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Atrial fibrillation: a frequent problem in clinical practice]. Bethge KP; Gonska BD; Jung W; Manz M; Schöls W; Wehr M Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1998 Dec; 123(50):1525-9. PubMed ID: 9879283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Confounding factors in rate versus rhythm control trials in patients with atrial fibrillation: lessons from the strategies of treatment of atrial fibrillation (STAF) pilot study. Carlsson J; Boos C Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Jun; 7(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 14618034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion predicts subsequent pharmacologic and electrical conversion to sinus rhythm and amiodarone. Van Noord T; Van Gelder IC; Schoonderwoerd BA; Crijns HJ Am J Cardiol; 2000 Dec; 86(12):1384-5, A5. PubMed ID: 11113420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized trials of rate vs. rhythm control for atrial fibrillation. Chung MK J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2004; 10 Suppl 1():45-53. PubMed ID: 14739739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rate versus rhythm control in atrial fibrillation: no one-size-fits-all. McClanahan AL; Curtis AB Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2010 Jul; 8(7):891-3. PubMed ID: 20602548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rate versus rhythm control: is the debate over? Camm AJ; Savelieva I J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2002 Aug; 7(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 12391416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Atrial fibrillation: rate versus rhythm control. Amani F; Smith ES J Ark Med Soc; 2005 Oct; 102(4):110-2. PubMed ID: 16265929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rate control at least as effective as rhythm control for AF patients. Geriatrics; 2002 May; 57(5):63. PubMed ID: 12040594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]