413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30375361)
1. Toward a new treatment planning approach accounting for in vivo proton range verification.
Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Kamp F; Pinto M; Niepel K; Belka C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215025. PubMed ID: 30375361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new treatment planning approach accounting for prompt gamma range verification and interfractional anatomical changes.
Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Pinto M; Kamp F; Belka C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(9):095005. PubMed ID: 32135530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accounting for prompt gamma emission and detection for range verification in proton therapy treatment planning.
Tian L; Huang Z; Janssens G; Landry G; Dedes G; Kamp F; Belka C; Pinto M; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(5):055005. PubMed ID: 33171445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo study on the sensitivity of prompt gamma imaging to proton range variations due to interfractional changes in prostate cancer patients.
Schmid S; Landry G; Thieke C; Verhaegen F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Parodi K; Dedes G
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(24):9329-47. PubMed ID: 26581022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo proton dose calculations using a radiotherapy specific dual-energy CT scanner for tissue segmentation and range assessment.
Almeida IP; Schyns LEJR; Vaniqui A; van der Heyden B; Dedes G; Resch AF; Kamp F; Zindler JD; Parodi K; Landry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(11):115008. PubMed ID: 29616662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An algorithm to assess the need for clinical Monte Carlo dose calculation for small proton therapy fields based on quantification of tissue heterogeneity.
Bueno M; Paganetti H; Duch MA; Schuemann J
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081704. PubMed ID: 23927301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging of prompt gamma rays emitted during delivery of clinical proton beams with a Compton camera: feasibility studies for range verification.
Polf JC; Avery S; Mackin DS; Beddar S
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(18):7085-99. PubMed ID: 26317610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo patient study on the comparison of prompt gamma and PET imaging for range verification in proton therapy.
Moteabbed M; España S; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):1063-82. PubMed ID: 21263174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A GPU-accelerated and Monte Carlo-based intensity modulated proton therapy optimization system.
Ma J; Beltran C; Seum Wan Chan Tseung H; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121707. PubMed ID: 25471954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fast MCsquare-Based Independent Dose Verification Platform for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.
Liu C; Ho MW; Park J; Hsi WC; Liang X; Li Z; Song Y; Feng H; Zhang Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211033076. PubMed ID: 34338058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of GATE-RTion (GATE/Geant4) Monte Carlo simulation settings for proton pencil beam scanning quality assurance.
Winterhalter C; Taylor M; Boersma D; Elia A; Guatelli S; Mackay R; Kirkby K; Maigne L; Ivanchenko V; Resch AF; Sarrut D; Sitch P; Vidal M; Grevillot L; Aitkenhead A
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5817-5828. PubMed ID: 32967037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Requirements for a Compton camera for in vivo range verification of proton therapy.
Rohling H; Priegnitz M; Schoene S; Schumann A; Enghardt W; Hueso-González F; Pausch G; Fiedler F
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2795-2811. PubMed ID: 28195562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shortening delivery times for intensity-modulated proton therapy by reducing the number of proton spots: an experimental verification.
van de Water S; Belosi MF; Albertini F; Winterhalter C; Weber DC; Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095008. PubMed ID: 32155594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of TPS calculation algorithms on dose delivered to the patient in proton therapy treatments.
Molinelli S; Russo S; Magro G; Maestri D; Mairani A; Mastella E; Mirandola A; Vai A; Vischioni B; Valvo F; Ciocca M
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(7):075016. PubMed ID: 30802887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Macro Monte Carlo for dose calculation of proton beams.
Fix MK; Frei D; Volken W; Born EJ; Aebersold DM; Manser P
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):2027-44. PubMed ID: 23458969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
