110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30375362)
1. In vivo measurement of the effective atomic number of breast skin using spectral mammography.
Berggren K; Eriksson M; Hall P; Wallis MG; Fredenberg E
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215023. PubMed ID: 30375362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of breast-tissue x-ray attenuation by spectral imaging: fresh and fixed normal and malignant tissue.
Fredenberg E; Willsher P; Moa E; Dance DR; Young KC; Wallis MG
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235003. PubMed ID: 30465547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of volumetric breast density estimation in digital mammograms.
Holland K; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3779-3797. PubMed ID: 28230532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients.
Klein R; Aichinger H; Dierker J; Jansen JT; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Zoetelief J
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):651-71. PubMed ID: 9127443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast composition and radiographic breast equivalence.
McLean D
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar; 20(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9141308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new mammography dosimetric phantom.
Almeida CD; Coutinho CM; Dantas BM; Peixoto JE; Koch HA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):196-8. PubMed ID: 22223722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast-density measurement using photon-counting spectral mammography.
Johansson H; von Tiedemann M; Erhard K; Heese H; Ding H; Molloi S; Fredenberg E
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3579-3593. PubMed ID: 28421611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-specific Monte Carlo dose calculations for (103)Pd breast brachytherapy.
Miksys N; Cygler JE; Caudrelier JM; Thomson RM
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 61(7):2705-29. PubMed ID: 26976478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suitability of low density materials for 3D printing of physical breast phantoms.
Ivanov D; Bliznakova K; Buliev I; Popov P; Mettivier G; Russo P; Di Lillo F; Sarno A; Vignero J; Bosmans H; Bravin A; Bliznakov Z
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(17):175020. PubMed ID: 29999497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of breast-tissue x-ray attenuation by spectral mammography: first results on cyst fluid.
Fredenberg E; Dance DR; Willsher P; Moa E; von Tiedemann M; Young KC; Wallis MG
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 58(24):8609-20. PubMed ID: 24254377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.
Wu X; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 2006265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic density measurements are not affected by mammography system.
Damases CN; Brennan PC; McEntee MF
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2015 Jan; 2(1):015501. PubMed ID: 26158085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. WAXS fat subtraction model to estimate differential linear scattering coefficients of fatless breast tissue: phantom materials evaluation.
Tang RY; Laamanen C; McDonald N; LeClair RJ
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):053501. PubMed ID: 24784407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms.
Dance DR; Hunt RA; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):359-63. PubMed ID: 15933137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of breast-tissue x-ray attenuation by spectral mammography: solid lesions.
Fredenberg E; Kilburn-Toppin F; Willsher P; Moa E; Danielsson M; Dance DR; Young KC; Wallis MG
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 61(7):2595-612. PubMed ID: 26961507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. X-ray characterization of breast phantom materials.
Byng JW; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1998 May; 43(5):1367-77. PubMed ID: 9623665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detectability comparison between a high energy x-ray phase sensitive and mammography systems in imaging phantoms with varying glandular-adipose ratios.
Ghani MU; Wong MD; Wu D; Zheng B; Fajardo LL; Yan A; Fuh J; Wu X; Liu H
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3523-3538. PubMed ID: 28379851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-energy approach to contrast-enhanced mammography using the balanced filter method: spectral optimization and preliminary phantom measurement.
Saito M
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4236-46. PubMed ID: 18072488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
