These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30375362)

  • 61. Breast skin thickness: normal range and causes of thickening shown on film-screen mammography.
    Pope TL; Read ME; Medsker T; Buschi AJ; Brenbridge AN
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 6526847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Towards the prediction of flow-induced shear stress distributions experienced by breast cancer cells in the lymphatics.
    Morley ST; Newport DT; Walsh MT
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Dec; 16(6):2051-2062. PubMed ID: 28741084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
    Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Attenuation of monochromatic X-rays by normal and abnormal breast tissues.
    Carroll FE; Waters JW; Andrews WW; Price RR; Pickens DR; Willcott R; Tompkins P; Roos C; Page D; Reed G
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Mar; 29(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 8175299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Central X-ray beam correction of radiographic acetabular cup measurement after THA: an experimental study.
    Schwarz T; Weber M; Wörner M; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Craiovan B
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 May; 12(5):829-837. PubMed ID: 27714567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging.
    Thacker SC; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(24):5433-44. PubMed ID: 15724534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Dual Energy Method for Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study.
    Koukou V; Martini N; Michail C; Sotiropoulou P; Fountzoula C; Kalyvas N; Kandarakis I; Nikiforidis G; Fountos G
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():574238. PubMed ID: 26246848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A Monte Carlo study of macroscopic and microscopic dose descriptors for kilovoltage cellular dosimetry.
    Oliver PA; Thomson RM
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(4):1417-1436. PubMed ID: 28114113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Measurement of compressed breast thickness by optical stereoscopic photogrammetry.
    Tyson AH; Mawdsley GE; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):569-76. PubMed ID: 19291996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
    Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A new method for modelling the tongue-and-groove in treatment planning systems.
    Hernandez V; Vera-Sánchez JA; Vieillevigne L; Khamphan C; Saez J
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 63(24):245005. PubMed ID: 30523940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Real-time wireless tumor tracking during breast conserving surgery.
    Janssen N; Eppenga R; Peeters MV; van Duijnhoven F; Oldenburg H; van der Hage J; Rutgers E; Sonke JJ; Kuhlmann K; Ruers T; Nijkamp J
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Apr; 13(4):531-539. PubMed ID: 29134472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Segmentation of the fibro-glandular disc in mammograms using Gaussian mixture modelling.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Borges RA; Frère AF
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 May; 42(3):378-87. PubMed ID: 15191084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Doses in mammography: from the phantom to the patient.
    Cross P
    Australas Radiol; 1994 Feb; 38(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 8147794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Accurate estimation of compressed breast thickness in mammography.
    Mawdsley GE; Tyson AH; Peressotti CL; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):577-86. PubMed ID: 19291997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Atomic and electronic structures of Si(1 1 1)-(√3 x √3)R30°-Au and (6 × 6)-Au surfaces.
    Patterson CH
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2015 Dec; 27(47):475001. PubMed ID: 26459741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Comparison of three tissue composition measurement techniques using digital mammograms--a signal-to-noise study.
    Breitenstein DS; Shaw CC
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3):137-50. PubMed ID: 9718504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and X-ray mammography.
    Graham SJ; Bronskill MJ; Byng JW; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF
    Br J Cancer; 1996 Jan; 73(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 8546901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues.
    Johns PC; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Jun; 32(6):675-95. PubMed ID: 3039542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. INDIVIDUALISED CALCULATION OF TISSUE IMPARTED ENERGY IN BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS.
    Geeraert N; Klausz R; Muller S; Bloch I; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):267-73. PubMed ID: 27127209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.