441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30375655)
1. Dose volume histogram-based optimization of image reconstruction parameters for quantitative
Siman W; Mikell JK; Mawlawi OR; Mourtada F; Kappadath SC
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):229-237. PubMed ID: 30375655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic and random errors of PET-based
Siman W; Mawlawi OR; Mourtada F; Kappadath SC
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(6):2441-2449. PubMed ID: 32135025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PET optimization for improved assessment and accurate quantification of 90Y-microsphere biodistribution after radioembolization.
Martí-Climent JM; Prieto E; Elosúa C; Rodríguez-Fraile M; Domínguez-Prado I; Vigil C; García-Velloso MJ; Arbizu J; Peñuelas I; Richter JA
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):092503. PubMed ID: 25186412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of image reconstruction method on dose distributions derived from
Hou X; Ma H; Esquinas PL; Uribe C; Tolhurst S; Bénard F; Liu D; Rahmim A; Celler A
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215022. PubMed ID: 33245057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of image reconstruction bias on PET/CT 90Y dosimetry after radioembolization.
Tapp KN; Lea WB; Johnson MS; Tann M; Fletcher JW; Hutchins GD
J Nucl Med; 2014 Sep; 55(9):1452-8. PubMed ID: 24982437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for
Rowley LM; Bradley KM; Boardman P; Hallam A; McGowan DR
J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative (90)Y image reconstruction in PET.
Willowson K; Forwood N; Jakoby BW; Smith AM; Bailey DL
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):7153-9. PubMed ID: 23127106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 90Y PET-based dosimetry after selective internal radiotherapy treatments.
D'Arienzo M; Chiaramida P; Chiacchiararelli L; Coniglio A; Cianni R; Salvatori R; Ruzza A; Scopinaro F; Bagni O
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Jun; 33(6):633-40. PubMed ID: 22407156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of PMT-based TF64 and SiPM-based Vereos PET/CT systems for
Trotta N; Collette B; Mathey C; Vierasu I; Bucalau AM; Verset G; Moreno-Reyes R; Goldman S
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7567-7582. PubMed ID: 35894818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The edge artifact in the point-spread function-based PET reconstruction at different sphere-to-background ratios of radioactivity.
Kidera D; Kihara K; Akamatsu G; Mikasa S; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Takeshita T; Maebatake A; Miwa K; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 26531181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Yttrium-90 quantitative phantom study using digital photon counting PET.
Labour J; Boissard P; Baudier T; Khayi F; Kryza D; Durebex PV; Martino SP; Mognetti T; Sarrut D; Badel JN
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Jul; 8(1):56. PubMed ID: 34318383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of Yttrium-90 PET/CT imaging.
Attarwala AA; Molina-Duran F; Büsing KA; Schönberg SO; Bailey DL; Willowson K; Glatting G
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110401. PubMed ID: 25369020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A gate evaluation of the sources of error in quantitative
Strydhorst J; Carlier T; Dieudonné A; Conti M; Buvat I
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5320-5329. PubMed ID: 28105711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm.
Vennart NJ; Bird N; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Nowosinska E; Heard S
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):471-479. PubMed ID: 28394818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. (90)Y-PET/CT Imaging Quantification for Dosimetry in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: Analysis and Corrections of the Impairing Factors.
Fabbri C; Bartolomei M; Mattone V; Casi M; De Lauro F; Bartolini N; Gentili G; Amadori S; Agostini M; Sarti G
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2015 Jun; 30(5):200-10. PubMed ID: 25860616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using EQ·PET to reduce reconstruction-dependent variations in [
Vanhoutte M; Semah F; Lopes R; Jaillard A; Petyt G; Aziz AL; Lahousse H; Declerck J; Pasquier F; Spottiswoode B; Fahmi R
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):175002. PubMed ID: 31344691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
